0xbd7dbab9…204asent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#21,917,033·view on Etherscan
@0x7f64...d6d2
I really hear this and would love any support finding a great co-sponsor. Ultimately this team is amazing at getting the best animators in the world involved with Nouns and I think that shines through with this collection so far.
Sponsorship requires a lot in return including potential direction on type of content and required usage/ownership plus reach. We've had some great convo's with sponsors but nothing has landed yet.
We're doing thing different with CC0, creator ownership and control and don't think Nouns should lose the momentum on one of the best programs it has, with top tier executive talent that has proven themselves to overdeliver.
>
>
> Had to say it here so it stays onchain and gets conveyed.
>
> In year 3, it makes no sense for Nouns to be the only entity footing the entire bill (2024 event was 1.9mil+ all funded by Nouns). You have got to get a separate sponsor while Nouns can play the part of title sponsor for this festival.
>
> otherwise it feels like a commercially non-viable festival which doesn't happen next year if nouns stops paying the money.
>
> --
> Please consider taking time to find a co-sponsor and rework the budgeting here.
> At least a trend or attempt towards decreasing DAO's funding liability here will go a long way. (By decreasing i don't mean cutting scope of festival which this prop did).
>
> This would have looked so much different if there was another sponsor coming in with another 400k funding for the event side by side with Nouns.
>