0x560ddbb5…79e6sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#25,002,369·view on Etherscan
+1
> For a Nouns funded project, the lack of Noggles is a significant issue. Noggles are the primary visual identifier of the brand. Even as an optional accessory, they are essential to bridge the gap between general toy and Nounish toy. Without them, the brand alignment feels too weak in my opinion. Looking at them without previous context, no one would have any idea these are Nouns.
>
> The proposal centers on the Taipei Toy Festival as the primary activation, yet the production timeline suggests the toys won't be ready until Christmas 2026. This creates a disconnect...we are funding an activation where the primary product won't be available.
>
> The distribution and sales strategy remains unclear. Is this a marketing expense (treasury funds spent for exposure) or a commercial venture? Furthermore, there are no hard metrics or KPIs for success. I am concerned that this proposal relies too heavily on "vibes" rather than concrete, measurable outcomes that the DAO can use to evaluate the success of this capital allocation.
>
> I would be open to supporting a revised version that includes clear branding, a production schedule that aligns with the event, and a concrete plan for distribution and data collection.
+1
> these look cute. event is good as well. I am abstaining since I would want Nouns to receive substantial royalties OR majority share of anything where it is funding production.