0xc3fdadba…36bbsent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,544,139·view on Etherscan
While I appreciate Nounsprotector's investigation, I don't view this prop as a governance attack at all. Exposure to stETH is a real risk to the DAO and imo worth us funding investigations into mitigations – Cozy being one such possibilities.
I do have some general questions around the exact approach we should take to this risk though:
1) Are we taking on any *additional* risk with stETH given how much Lido already underpins ethereum?
2) If we think there is marginal risk, how does insurance compare to diversification or reducing our exposure to any staked ETH?
Regardless, I think this prop is a reasonable exploration and worth funding given its relatively low risk. Even just getting an Optimism proxy itself is worth the price of admission on this one!