0x7c1282a7…7b2dsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#20,217,202·view on Etherscan
@0x4459...7E25
Hi Noun 1148,
I want to make it clear that we are not claiming credit for any events we weren't involved in. We are one of the official partners for the fun run event. https://x.com/0xwideeye/status/1808023753567395995
Specifically, we provided Nounish media (shout out to CC0-Lib), which was turned into stickers and shared throughout the event.
We'd also like to reiterate a point we've previously shared: we are not creating for the sake of creating. Finding the right location for our Nounish public installations is just as important as the creations themselves. Mt. Liupian, with its ongoing events and natural appeal, is an excellent location. A public installation there allows ⌐◨-◨ to be seen and appreciated by many, aligning with our goal to attract people to the ⌐◨-◨ brand, having them enjoy ⌐◨-◨ , rather than pushing information onto them. Therefore, location was a key factor when we were planning Prop 570.
The content being shared was simply a happy coincidence that aligned with the ongoing Prop 570. To suggest that our efforts were disingenuous is harsh. Our intention was to update and showcase what has been happening, providing more content with Nouns context.
p.s Nouns Folks: Appreciate all the support and kind words towards Prop 570 as well as myself and Karl thus far, means alot ⌐◨-◨
>
>
> I feel that Nouns has lost its former charm. Personally, I'm not fond of these superficial marketing proposals. The deliverables from the previous Liupian proposal seem to be opportunistically claiming credit for events that just happened to take place in the same location. The overwhelming flood of images and videos appears to be nothing more than an attempt to garner voter support. It all comes across as disingenuous.
>
> I question whether these low-quality marketing efforts truly help people understand and appreciate Nouns. Are they really effective in introducing Nouns to a wider audience and fostering genuine interest? I have my doubts.
>
> The essence of Nouns seems to be diluted by these tactics, and I'm concerned we're moving away from what made Nouns special in the first place. It's disheartening to see the project potentially compromising its integrity for the sake of flashy but ultimately hollow promotional stunts.
>
>