0xd75cca4d…f322sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#20,995,064·view on Etherscan
I find the KYC and AML concepts hilarious to be honest. Every single protocol who provides grants requires you to KYC (Are you going to call Ethereum Foundation centralized to their face?) and this same community harped on the most ridiculous questions when we brought Princess Sarah into Nouncil that makes me believe no one here actually understands why AML policies are in place.
My biggest problem with showcasing Nouns to a greater network is because this community can barely stay organized without a “paid what I deserve” to do it. If the money was gone, would they still be around or would they just move onto another community that has a fairly simple grants system to take money from? I would take some time to talk with David Horvath or myself about how difficult it has been to bring Nouns into the mainstream when we have to spend 2+ meetings explaining what Nouns even is and then explain “oh we have no structure, we’re a dao”.
I am new to Nouns, that’s true, but the nouns community that came before me was the same group that allowed millions of dollars to be distributed with little to no due diligence.
DUNA is a step forward and I’m here for it. We as a community should be making it as simple for future nouns contributors to thrive. Think about the longterm benefits and our goal to build a billion dollar public goods brand out of a CC0 community.