0x65a3870f…1d63sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,133,721·view on Etherscan
I'd rather give him an NFT -- paying him feels so corporate and gifting nouns is part of a long history. Sure some don't work out, but protecting the public resource doesn't make as much sense to me when there are 100s of nouns in the treasury and we aren't exactly burning through them
+1
> Wylin is indeed a community member worthy of our respect, and we believe he deserves retroactive rewards, but not in the form of Nouns NFTs. Instead, direct monetary compensation would be better.
>
> Gifting Nouns NFTs to someone is similar to an act of recognition, but what is the purpose of such recognition? Is it to inspire deeper identity recognition with NounsDAO in the recipient? However, when we search for 'Gift' on nouns.camp, the list includes people who have changed to Mfer avatars. When NFTs from the treasury are distributed but don't bring positive public impact, it's a waste of public resources.
>
> It's normal and good for proposers, the recognized individuals, and the sponsors to have friendly personal relationships. However, using public proposals to express this friendliness doesn't seem to be appropriate.
>
> Recently, Wylin's work has injected a healthy accountability culture into Nouns. We suggest compensating him for his due diligence and culture-building work on an hourly basis, potentially at a premium rate. On this point, we'd like to hear the community's and Wylin's thoughts.