0x8922c8ac…bcb2sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#23,301,553·view on Etherscan
@0x1368...5F20
hi @bigshottoyworks.eth Thank you for this thoughtful feedback. We are all ears and yes SwipePad can absolutely be adapted for many use-cases, including a flow for rating/voting on art projects (swipe right to like art or left to see next one, swipe down to dislike) things like that, it can also track proposal, review execution or proof of delivery for projects, and rewarding builders for progress. One of our goals is to make project impact and engagement more transparent, so the community has a simple way to follow along.
Regarding integrations: we see strong potential with Nounspace, Crafts, and other ecosystem division. It can serve to documenting project milestones directly inside SwipePad, it can serve as both a progress tracker and an engagement hub.
Tips — 100% adding features like tipping in $NOUNS or rewarding engagement is definitely aligned with our vision and the User does that on a swipe for easy user experience. We want to make it easy and fun for the community to support builders, artists, and public goods. And for supporters to select and supervise the work of the projects they support. For example another partners or protocols can join a matching pool for quadratic funding and things like that. All these use-cases and features are possible, but tbh those can come after the initial phase as it requires more work for us to complete. Thank you very much again for your input .
>
>
> This is kind of an interesting tool to rate/vote on Art projects if we do Artist engagement or rate proposals once executed on their performances Perhaps further reward builders for their progress etc. Beyond that I am not really sure where this falls and how it will encourage regular participation and engagement Is this something that can be used with things like Nounspace or GG? With every proposal documenting their progress this can add additional engagement and spark more interest. maybe if it was a tool for tipping in $nouns? I like the premise
>
@0x6fB5...83b0
thank you peterpandam.eth, sure thing let us reply you question about the asking. and we are open to partner with communities not only to pass this prop but to build with.
The 10K budget will cover:
Product Development & Engineering (5K): Customizing UI/UX for Nouns (flowcharts, desktop & mobile optimization dapp), building a dedicated Nouns category inside the miniapp we would launch in, researching projects to display, backend tools, smart contracts on mainnet, DevOps, AI tools, and hosting.
Research & UI/UX (1K):
Vetting projects, custom design & illustrations, updating badges and scoring UX, and adding new features tailored to Nouns.
Operations (3K):
Overseeing development, communications, accounting, partnerships, strategies, and app maintenance.
Growth & Community (1K):
Onboarding campaigns for projects and supporters (Discord, Farcaster, X), announcing the new Nouns category in SwipePad & ReFi Starter, and joint campaigns with aligned communities.
This ensures a fully functional Nouns category inside SwipePad, tailored to NounsDAO projects and community.
>
>
> Neither of your replies attempted to answer my question. I think you should partner up with a more endemic member of Nouns to help you if you want this proposal to pass.
>
> I feel like there are language and cultural barriers here which may be detracting from your authenticity.
>
> +1
>
> > @0x6fB5...83b0
> >
> > Also our good relationship with Octant, Funding the Commons, Regen Network, and some Stablecoin issuers. Together we can run campaigns and strategies to run other funding mechanisms inside the app, for example Quadratic Funding, Retro Funding. Flows looks great, we actually can display successful projects from Flow into SwipePad, we are here to work and add value. Tinder is web2 with no on-chain activity, when we mention Tinder for Public Goods we are talking about simplicity for the User. Replying from the project main account for accountability. Thanks : )
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the 10k for? "Tinder for public goods" isn't helping your cause imo. Feels similar to flows, who would voluntarily sign up for this rather than direct funding through the dao unless it's simply easier money?
> > >
>
> +1
>
> > @0x6fB5...83b0
> >
> > Thank you Peter for you comment, sure let us explain,. The proposal is missing our partners which are: ReFiDAO (40+ cities), GreenPill, Regens United, Celo Public Goods, Treegens, Glo Dollar, Ecosapiens, Blockchain for Good, DeSci World, and more. With all these communities we can help push the new Nouns. Also, we are focusing on MiniApps, starting with Minipay with 11 million registered users (400k active users per day), Farcaster, the new Base Social app, and other miniapps coming, all of these can give great exposure to projects on nouns and engagement. We cannot promise anything, but hardwork from out team to try to it relevant and hopefully beneficial for Nouns community. Please feel free to drop any other question or comment we are here anytime.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the 10k for? "Tinder for public goods" isn't helping your cause imo. Feels similar to flows, who would voluntarily sign up for this rather than direct funding through the dao unless it's simply easier money?
> > >
>
> +1
>
> > What is the 10k for? "Tinder for public goods" isn't helping your cause imo. Feels similar to flows, who would voluntarily sign up for this rather than direct funding through the dao unless it's simply easier money?