0x2767edfe…3938sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,169,292·view on Etherscan
nouns-dao-–-activating-social-channels@0xFC53...6183
+1
> Worried we're not going to land on any sort of route forward here and let the socials go inactive for another year+..
>
> - i don't think a flow (or similar) Nouners can curate and approve will work (most wont even want to).
> - i don't think ai will work, nor do people want to engage with ai (typically).
> - 'reposting each others content' hasn't worked yet and lacks any sort of official support.
> - i think removing the account or leaving it as-is, is a big mistake.
>
> I honestly think it takes one, maybe two people to make social media impactful. But, if the whole goal is to show we're not 'dead' - re-tweeting could work to show signs of life.. That's likely not a game-changer for our social presence tho.
>
> Would prefer to vote on and delegate access to one person who can put out thoughtful and unbiased posts while sticking to whatever guidelines we put in place; Tone, cadence of posting, tactics. Community can suggest posts through an intake form, but ultimately one person should decide when and how to post it for biggest impact (ie; a content calendar, daily posting, engaging with audience, etc). This isn't hard, it just takes actually doing it consistently.
>
> IMO we start with guidelines to work within then have some sort of open call to fill the role in a prop.house style mandated round. Could do a 1-3 month trial on a stream. Would throw my name in the ring if we decide to go this route.