0xa3e612e8…9fcbsent to0xc0495d62…0330·#21,345,056·view on Etherscan
You see how still the faucet system works? First it was innocuous almost and driven by some sense of request for participation in a network. Then it was incentivization, then it was airdrops (in their most predatory and luring form progressively), as we see it today. And human greed still manages to get euphemized as participation. A little talk of free value conversion and a market for it and suddenly the hind become readers of Seamus Heaney or at least find out of his existence. Onchain messaging starts looking like some lit up mall. Saying this as someone who has to do that himself for network participation and "incentivize" users for ecosystem "growth". You gotta bow to it and fill the books. Most will come for the crumbs but some will be incentivized in the good old ways to actually contribute meaningfully. Give it a thought.
Anon, who spammed onchain with answer - quite funny. According to me you are right. It's from Seamus Heaney, but I had the advantage of making that educated guess because I know he reads a lot of Heaney and I could identify the poem. But I think it's easy with google nowadays. So you are due the promised 6666666 the moment I get confirmation. Should I send it to the address you wrote from once confirmed?
And as for you another anon and your cocky presumption that has woken you to the onchain world to demand your reward. Your answer is wrong. And even if it was right I'd still not give you shit just out of spite. Your only reward is that i'll take your assumption as a compliment and your gg no re gibberish wankfest as solidity for rats. The answer is far more subtle and inside jokey but based on calendar facts and also again tied to another poet's birth. Incidentally. Go figure.