0xe3d73daa…a436sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#18,607,625·view on Etherscan
I am against. Giving people choice/liquidity to exit an organization counter-intuitively increases org alignment in my opinion. While I understand the protectionist instinct to raise the threshold to fork to be 30%, I believe that actually at the limit the best solution is a world where any nouner can choose to exit (or fork) at any point in time. Imagine if OpenSea only allowed people to sell out of ABC NFT community if N people agreed, or if Uniswap only allowed people to sell out of XYZ token if N amt was swapped. This means only holders with substantial financial influence or political influence can enact change - very frownish. I do not feel that belief is aligned with nounish (and cryptonative) values of open and permissionless expression and choice. I would support a lower fork threshold.