0x906f1af5…4bd3sent to0xdcb4117e…5e5e·#25,003,971·view on Etherscan
#**FOR 223 VOTES**
**mikegood.eth**
**nocguild.eth** | *"s/o noc legend duckhead"*
**pipe da snowman** | *"Duckhead will be able to take orders for the vinyl toys at the toy shows, the 100+ resin prototypes give a good idea of the final vinyl products, whilst also serving as collectibles themselves.
We need more thoughtful products like this imo, these are hugely collectible and have a real chance of breaking through into gacha market in asia. Duckhead has been making beautiful nounish art for years now, and I hope we can let him cook and deliver a thousand of these toys and market them irl for us at the same time.
Holding one of these in a photo beats wearing irl noggles imo, support the noggles-off vibe here 100%, it is clearly nounish. Now, potential future noggle-wearing editions might become the rarest, if we design it this way.
Huge scope here and appreciate this is a long game and going through the process correctly and carefully is wise. Thanks to Duckhead for the proposal."*
**davinoyesigye.eth**
**AGAINST 1 VOTES**
**coolbeans1r.eth** | *"I appreciate the effort put into this proposal, but I cannot support it in its current state. I have a few major concerns:
For a Nouns funded project, the lack of Noggles is a significant issue. Noggles are the primary visual identifier of the brand. Even as an optional accessory, they are essential to bridge the gap between "general toy" and "Nounish toy." Without them, the brand alignment feels too weak.
The proposal centers on the Taipei Toy Festival as the primary activation, yet the production timeline suggests the toys won't be ready until Christmas 2026. This creates a disconnect... we are funding an activation where the primary product won't be available.
The distribution and sales strategy remains unclear. Is this a marketing expense (treasury funds spent for exposure) or a commercial venture? Furthermore, there are no hard metrics or KPIs for success. I am concerned that this proposal relies too heavily on "vibes" rather than concrete, measurable outcomes that the DAO can use to evaluate the success of this capital allocation.
I would be open to supporting a revised version that includes clear branding, a production schedule that aligns with the event, and a concrete plan for distribution and data collection."*
**ABSTAIN 0 VOTES**