0xe3d73daa…a436sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,108,803·view on Etherscan
I like the proposers' nounish history. I am generally skeptical of "physical" stuff, if only because it can have at best limited reach, and is not the most crypto-native thing that we could be doing with our funds. While it'
s certainly valuable for people to interact with the noun brand and iconography to become "onboarded", i feel like the conversion pipeline for physical projects like these are vague at best. That said, I think since the ask is <0.5% of the treasury, it seems like an ok use of funds and will vote for. In general, I would not support more expensive props for physical stuff as I would rather the treasury be used on more internet-native and crypto-native projects.