0xe3ff24a9…149dsent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#21,425,425·view on Etherscan
In favor of complying with DUNA, not in favor of minority protection via exit.
+1
> The dao showed it doesn’t honestly care about minority protection by refusing to lower fork threshold before duna prop.
>
> As such, there’s no point in voting through this streaming change which is materially worse for the dao and only offers in return something we’ve seen few honestly care for (minority protection)
>
> Against
+1
> The exit mechanic already functions through secondary sales, which are occurring almost daily.
>
> The fork threshold is currently at 100%. Ragequit was undeniably a mistake and can no longer happen. Any external attacks can be vetoed. So what are we doing here?
>
> Ideas like this feel like a significant waste of time and only introduce new attack vectors that this proposal fails to address.
+1
> Ive never been a strong proponent of this design (on the contrary been strongly against it in the past) but all-in-all i think this is a fine feature and net-positive compared to having no exit/refund mech.
>
> Thanks david/elad for all the hard work on this!