0x2d9cbc4e…aa8bsent to0x5d2c31ce…4039·#23,942,024·view on Etherscan
"Why? With all the innovative props in the past months, this feels like a slap in the face!" -The Community
"Scandalous" -New Yok Times
“Legendary chaos. Finally, someone gets it.” -FTX (Archived Account)
“Ethics left the building.” -MIT Technology Review
“Aggressively profit-optimal.” -Enron (Legacy Shareholder Forum)
“The public doesn’t need to understand it. Motion passes.” -Closed Session Minutes, Undisclosed Committee
“Unanimous approval. External stakeholders deemed non-essential.” -Private Equity Steering Circle
“This advances our long-term leverage. Community impact: irrelevant.” -Internal Strategy Memo, Redacted Group
“Proceed before transparency becomes a variable.” -Off-Record Governance Council Vote
-"No" -MetaMu
+1
> I’ve been thinking about it and I still can’t find any real logic in buying two more Nouns for Lil’s. I’ve tried to see the strategic angle or some long term upside, but nothing clicks. It just feels like spending because we can; a neat way to make the treasury lighter while giving the community nothing useful in return.
>
> Maybe we should actually use topics or candidate threads for these conversations, just so it feels a bit more like governance and a bit less like tossing ideas into the void. And sure, gas is cheap these days, but that still doesn’t mean we need to turn proposals into a bargain bin where every low effort idea gets tossed in just because it costs almost nothing to submit.