LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
TOO FUCKING LATE. The people who highjacked the vote ALREADY HAS ENOUGH VOTES TO VETO YOU! These subDAOs were simply tax havens for peoples crypto money. Nothing more nothing less, let them take it all because you mfers don't care about shyt but getting off your nut. There's no real communities in these subDAOs just self service machines for the fam. I sneer at those who thought bringing their money onchain to wave it in peoples faces knowing good and damn well most these subDAOs never intended it to be for public community. Yalls systems are ALL WEAK ASF and you did that on purpose so that you could reach your tax free money easier and now that other people figured out access to it you sitting here looking dumb trying to scramble and protect your "public money fund" aka DAO from being drained and your tax free money being emptied Good on whoever got it to actually use it. Maybe these SubDAOs will finally wake up..... Wait no, most did and hence why they've moved their money OFF of builder into vaults... Yall didn't see the patterns or you chose to ignore it because secretly your cut of that tax free money needs to bbe saved too. Sad times for fake DAOs. 2025 was the year of enlightenment. Wonder what 2026 brings us.
"Why? With all the innovative props in the past months, this feels like a slap in the face!" -The Community
"Scandalous" -New Yok Times
“Legendary chaos. Finally, someone gets it.” -FTX (Archived Account)
“Ethics left the building.” -MIT Technology Review
“Aggressively profit-optimal.” -Enron (Legacy Shareholder Forum)
“The public doesn’t need to understand it. Motion passes.” -Closed Session Minutes, Undisclosed Committee
“Unanimous approval. External stakeholders deemed non-essential.” -Private Equity Steering Circle
“This advances our long-term leverage. Community impact: irrelevant.” -Internal Strategy Memo, Redacted Group
“Proceed before transparency becomes a variable.” -Off-Record Governance Council Vote
-"No" -MetaMu
+1
> I’ve been thinking about it and I still can’t find any real logic in buying two more Nouns for Lil’s. I’ve tried to see the strategic angle or some long term upside, but nothing clicks. It just feels like spending because we can; a neat way to make the treasury lighter while giving the community nothing useful in return.
>
> Maybe we should actually use topics or candidate threads for these conversations, just so it feels a bit more like governance and a bit less like tossing ideas into the void. And sure, gas is cheap these days, but that still doesn’t mean we need to turn proposals into a bargain bin where every low effort idea gets tossed in just because it costs almost nothing to submit.
Gnericvibes has been ever present in her web3 pursuit of knowledge and support. She has reaped Nouns through her art, through spaces and now through her music and fashion! This is a clear yes for me, let's test some stuff and find out! The budget is modest and the time is now!
⌐◨-◨
downhill-nouns-connecting-with-the-world-irl
Ssounds like a great event. Would like to see a bit more in the deliverable section but feels like we are early to a future global event.
Farcaster has been a tough cookie to crack, but if you think this is the best place to build out infrastructure then we can be convinced to support in the future.
Need to do more research in what an ENS resolver is and the rest of the components of this proposal. Next ENS related proposal I'll be ready to provide more solid feedback plus a more informed vote!
Sounds like a no-brainer! Slow down the clock and we all work to get more people into these wonderful Daos! Let's take a moment and enjoy this onchain summer before it ends!
Just now getting around to learning about this Dao and this character Bean. I've started to notice some appearances of Bean and would love to see more and maybe some collabs with other Dao members to solidify his name in our circles? Looking forward to seeing this prop coming back revised and maybe more focused?