0x7c1282a7…7b2dsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#21,633,475·view on Etherscan
@0x39a7...aBc0
1\ This prop is being implemented solely by Karl and me, no other parties involved. I can assure you that neither of us would ever send insulting messages, it's not our way and serves no purpose. I encourage you to share the offending message on Warpcast, and we can work together to trace its source.
2\ Regarding CAFA(International College) and CAFA, they are different campuses of the same institution. If you are concerned about their connection, please note that CAFA International College is 100% owned by CAFA in terms of both governance and investment, as previously confirmed by other members’ investigations once again.
3\ On the matter of campus accessibility, all Chinese universities adhere to their own security and access policies for external visitors. I’ve shared photos taken at the campus gate yesterday on
https://warpcast.com/noun74/0xffcdbbd1 , allowing all members to determine whether this qualifies as “closed” or not.
4\ I think I’ve identified who you are, and I’m sorry to see that your original fork plan failed due to the DUNA, leaving you with 43 Nouns stuck in your possession.
The new alias "Janedoe" is interesting, though I find "Protector" more fitting. Changing accounts and addresses repeatedly won’t erase the clear connections between ur delegation addresses and your systematic opposition to DUNA.
Your coordinated efforts to discredit Karl’s and my prop over the past two years across various platforms have been indeed exhausting for both of us.
I sincerely encourage u to adopt a more transparent and constructive approach. As I mentioned two years ago, if you genuinely aim to develop the market in China, the Nouns community—including Karl and myself—would be glad to support you.
Slander and rumors are not the only path to success.
>
>
> Since I voted against this proposal, someone sent me a private message cursing me to die. I feel it's necessary to explain the reasons behind my vote.
>
> I lived in Beijing for over ten years, not far from CAFA’s main campus, and I have some friends who graduated from there. I am very familiar with the relationship between CAFA and CAFAIC. Local residents would never confuse CAFA with CAFAIC. Although they are indeed connected in terms of asset ownership, these two institutions are simply not on the same level. This is also why CAFAIC could not obtain a subdomain under cafa.edu.cn and had to register its own independent domain.
>
> I don't appreciate the way the proposer has somewhat blurred the lines between CAFA and CAFAIC. Just look at the title of this proposal: 'Noggle at Central Academy Of Fine Art Beijing.' I think this phrasing could mislead members of the community who are not familiar with the local context.
>
> I also dislike the fact that the CAFAIC campus is not open to the public. As shown on Baidu Maps, CAFAIC's campus is not an open-style campus.
>
> It seems the proposer does have a history of strong deliverables, but the approach of this proposal fails to convince me.
>
> I stand by my previous vote. If the proposer could place this Noggle installation at CAFA's main campus, I would be happy to support it.
>
> If there is any issue with my explanation, I sincerely welcome those who are more familiar with the situation to correct me. But there is no need cursing me to die.
>