0x66cd193d…8184sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#24,150,284·view on Etherscan
+1
> nouns need fewer "I'm gonna proliferate the meme bro" props
>
> +1
>
> > Let’s leave ‘let them cook’ props in 2025 and usher in a new year where proposals have set deliverables that proposers are expected to execute, not just make good faith efforts
+1
> How will this 'allow you to go all-in Nouns from day one next year' if you have an Ice Cream Truck you're not even half way through building for Lil Nouns and say you're 3 months behind on your most recent update? - https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMDd8Wvpb/
>
> --
>
> IMO, we're setting the wrong tone with these types of loose 'full time' roles that don't have a clear set of deliverables and are essentially 'let me cook' props.
>
> The "i commit to" section is something all of the remaining active contributors try to do, no? (besides DJing X spaces). Paying one person to do general things like these will ultimately make others not want to do them anymore, unless paid... And clearly, seeing props like this makes others want the same role (as we see from more steward candidates going up)..
>
> IMO proposals need to be more defined. If you want to make a book- propose to make a book. etc..
>
> I value the work you've done, and love you have for Nouns but I honestly expect more from people who have been around for so long and attempting to 'steward' more people into the DAO. Its disappointing to see this type of stuff with meme number asks "$69,420" ... So also worried that this is the type of prop you'll encourage and help bring to the dao in the future.
>
> Happy new year, ya'll ⌐◨-◨
>
> +1
>
> > Generally supportive in all Pipe does in different packaging and context. Shelf live and expiration date appears to be convoluted in stewardships.
> > it mostly comes down to the fact that I don't like stewardships as standalone isolated incentives structures