0x41cb654d…be4asent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#22,356,084·view on Etherscan
This proposal is premature. While onboarding small cities sounds promising in theory, the plan presented here is extremely underdeveloped. There is no validation of real demand — no cities are confirmed, no letters of intent, no surveys, or pilot programs showing that small cities even want crypto payment solutions or nounish partnerships.
The execution plan is equally vague: there are no clear milestones, success metrics, risk analysis, or deliverables. The budget primarily funds speculative exploration and salaries without offering a concrete product or measurable outputs for the DAO.
Additionally, the proposal conflates onboarding a single surf institute with meaningfully bringing a city on-chain — a major stretch with no real structural impact demonstrated.
The proposed revenue model is also highly speculative, based on the idea that accepting crypto will somehow generate income for the DAO, without providing any financial modeling or evidence that this assumption holds true.
I am also skeptical of RickDay’s recurring pattern of positioning himself as an intermediary through emotional storytelling. This repeated framing, without strong operational execution behind it, does not inspire confidence in the responsible use of treasury funds.
At $100K, this proposal represents a major mismatch between the ask and the current readiness level. Ideas at this stage of development should be tested with smaller grants, not full DAO funding.