0x9dcba70b…8b8asent to0x8d59e106…2902·#24,241,437·view on Etherscan
lil-noun-<>-b<>rder/ess-builders'-op@0x50f1...Fc4a
Thanks for raising this it’s a fair concern and I appreciate you calling it out.
During the Public Nouns proposal process, we were encouraged to seek additional funding sources, as the scope of the Builder’s OP extended beyond the initial 3 ETH. The 3 ETH from Public Nouns was intentionally structured as seed support, not full program funding.
Since then, we’ve already begun execution. In partnership with BizMarket, we’ve built the first operational layer of the program and have started a 2-week Builder Sprint, which represents the final phase of the original Public Nouns proposal. As of now, delivery on that proposal is approximately 80% complete, with the Builder’s OP concluding by February 8th.
The ask from Lil Nouns is not speculative or pre-execution it’s to extend and scale a program that is already live. By the time this proposal is voted on, we’ll be able to share concrete results, including participation, products built, and early traction.
I’ve included links to the live registration and recent updates here for transparency:
https://x.com/BorderlessDev/status/2010988944620498952?s=20
Happy to share more details or metrics as the sprint progresses.
>
>
> This prop is asking for 10 ETH which to be honest gives me pause for a new concept especially since this project just got 3ETH from public goods, I’d suggest to reduce the ask or wait to re-propose until you have results with the @publicnouns funds they got 📖
>