0x1aa55a5f…bdacsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,466,672·view on Etherscan
@0xae47...5Fed
Pipe, you are acting like you just met me yesterday.
I’m the same person who has been working hard every day for the ecosystem and its communities for more than 3 years.
I know you are angry and this became some sort of personal revenge and maybe that’s fair.
We had to face the stop of the stream and to continue our work we are using a part of our presale to make sure we can deliver what we said we would.
Meanwhile, we are injecting other 120k$ (in addition to the 3.6b $nogs) into the dao through bids. We would never bid 50 eth in Nouns if we were not still working in and for the ecosystem.
The idea is to decentralise these Nouns’ ownership and governance, possibly moving them into a dedicated contract whose governance is handled by $nogs holders. We’re still trying to figure out how to do this practically, but this is the plan. Those Nouns will make the pool stronger but they won’t be owned by us.
We are also going to decentralise the LP, which will lead to a system where holders (including communities like Nouns and Lilnouns) will be able to claim their recurring share of fees based on their allocation.
Our focus is currently on increasing the dao’s treasury but I’m confident we will be able to get enough revenue for nogs too in the medium term. When that happens, we will inject more $ in the nogs ecosystem with a buy-burn that will benefit every holder.
Putting $ or Nouns in an abandoned party mostly made by non-holders is pointless at this stage, doesn’t do anyone any good.
Let us work and I promise the next few months will show you we are the same team who always tried to create cool and innovative infra for the ecosystem and most definitely not some evil conspiracy out to rug.
>
>
> tldr; you just withdrew another 148e from the community-funded LP after already extracting 200e+ by dumping tokens (20% of total supply) that were not even allocated for your team...
>
> https://basescan.org/tx/0x59bc62b69d5b35ddf5b1048b7eaae736be80959372d7879a493a5aa13dee873d
>
> What an "Act" this is turning out to be, I hope you return the $70,000+ in fees to the Party community that thought the tokenomics would be adhered to. The Nouns should be for them, not part of this allegedly illegal money laundering operation you got going on.
>