0xca89e247…119csent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#21,446,338·view on Etherscan
I'm against memecoins, but NOGS doesn't feel like one. This feels more akin to an experiment in governance, and I have a lot of trust in the team that they have earned over the years. The alterations based on feedback from previous versions of this prop only reinforce that. Easy yes.
+1
> nom nom NNS
+1
> $NOGS has a lot of functionality in Nouns Governance, I feel it is not a memecoin. Moreover, the team has also done a very good execution in the last proposal, I think it's worth to see the ending of this project!.
>
> +1
>
> > @0xE3ff...149d
> >
> > Hey Sam, I'm sorry but I really don't get it.
> >
> > The entire plan of this prop is to create open and scalable infrastructures that can be used by any project and community.
> >
> > $NOUNS will be able to generate Noggles Club tickets exactly like $NOGS.
> >
> > $NOUNS will be able to rely exactly on the same features we developed for $NOGS.
> >
> > $NOUNS will be able to get the same Governance system we developed for $NOGS.
> >
> > The ONLY thing that $NOGS does is allowing Nouns and the other nounish DAOs to benefit from the growth of the infrastructure we built, in terms of treasury and long term NFT value.
> >
> > Why do we have to focus just on the term "memecoin" (admittedly, probably misleading here) without focusing on all the positive externalities that this kind of approach creates?
> >
> > The rest of the ecosystem is suffering a lot in terms of resources and participation.
> >
> > Why can't we, for the first time, experiment a new approach where the growth of a funded infrastructure will have a direct impact on communities treasuries as well?
> >
> > That's why we care so much about this prop.
> >
> > It's not about putting $200k on a single platform like the Noggles Club and then move on to something else without further updates.
> >
> > It's about creating an ecosystem of products that work in synergy and become stronger and stronger together, while supporting the whole ecosystem in terms of utility and resources.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > I really do respect the effort that has been put into this project to help grow Nouns, and I actually think this concept of creating a platform that incentivizes people to explore and participate in other nounish projects is worth funding.
> > >
> > > However, I just don't personally like $NOGS. I'm fine with people creating nounish memecoins and they probably end up being a net good for Nouns but I don't think the DAO should fund them.
> > >
> > > If you guys were to come to the DAO and propose the Noggles Club concept but built on top of $nouns, I would be happy to support it, albeit somewhere in the $200-250k price range.
> > >
+1
> We're passing props from from people that are barely involved with nouns.
>
> Choosing to support long-time, commited builders whom I know will have Nouns interest as a priority. Good luck!