0x9e0e9d25…57b1sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#23,493,889·view on Etherscan
sunset-nouns-95
My concern is that this create another client building marathon.
Nouns has burned around 2 million on more than 20 clients.
The few popular ones still run today on incentive money.
Building client-incentive mechanism alone likely cost the DAO over 500k. Judged on the products we actually use today, which Verbs built last year.
I think incentives are a fair way to filter which clients are useful, even though the process is locked behind KYC.
DAO voted against spending a few dollars on taxes over compliance for clients.
So it feels strange to start another marathon of funding niche clients again by funding a new client over 100x of taxes that DAO might owe on client-incentives.
If a client can gain enough traction, it can earn more.
Clients should be built to provide value that others do not and then compete fairly on incentives.