0xe04885c3…8846sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#20,893,160·view on Etherscan
@0xc6a3...96E4
Thanks. Appreciate the clarification. I am observing that different people having very specific criteria that can differ from others very specific criteria can often lead to a jam.
From my experience, in DAOs, its ideal when there is a very clear shared mission that many/most people really care about. When that is the case, things seem to flow and become easier.
Also, happy to chat more "offchain". (even though nouns camp is a really fun (yet expensive) place to do it!)
> @0xE048...8846
>
> Not codified anywhere that I'm aware of, and while I know some people share the ethos, can't say that I'm speaking for anyone but myself in my VWRs
>
> appreciate the interest though and happy to discuss more offchain
>
> > @0xc6a3...96E4
> >
> > Hi there!
> >
> > This part you wrote about the three things that you think Nouns should fund is quite helpful to see:
> >
> > "regardless of Nouns treasury size, i think it is important that the proposals we fund hit one or more of these:
> > a) public goods either in the hyper technical definition of non-excludable & non-rivalrous or in the spirit of those words (charitable impact, doing good for the public at large, {strong disagree with nbaronia about physical spaces})
> > b) provide direct benefit to Nouns voters by solving pain points in the existing processes
> > c) introduce Nouns to new bidders and builders who can accelerate the memetic flywheel"
> >
> > Is this defined or expanded on somewhere? And is this Nouns DAO view or your personal view?
> >
> > Appreciate the help.
> >
> > > Agora stands out for me as one of Nouns tech success stories.
> > >
> > > a small team funded 20eth (with eth priced at ~$1,500) to solve a very specific problem for Nouns - delegation. They identified a pain point in Nouns’ tooling and solved it, making it easier to disseminate information and coordinate with aligned individuals in the ecosystem, and saw significant traction among Nouners. (RIP Prop.House)
> > > they came back, ultimately passing a prop for $221k. a hefty price tag, yet there were was a clear roadmap and deliverables providing direct value to Nouns DAO. the product was so good that Optimism, ENS, & Uniswap adopted the product and the company received venture backing
> > >
> > > (why Nouns then gave a non-dilutive $500k grant to & created client incentives for a Y-Combinator portfolio company that was on the verge of closing it’s doors to build a governance client when there is seemingly no roadmap to venture scalability or break even revenue generation is beyond me, but “alignment”)
> > >
> > > i think what’s missing for nounspace is that it doesn’t solve any problems for Nouns. the mandate for the round was, “to build a dedicated Nouns client to help surface information across the Nouns ecosystem.” a myspace style profile doesn’t serve that purpose; it doesn’t make discussion and coordination any easier, it doesn’t help proposers connect with voters. i have used the product several times. my profile isn’t customized because i didn’t feel the need or desire to save the changes made
> > >
> > > regardless of Nouns treasury size, i think it is important that the proposals we fund hit one or more of these:
> > > a) public goods either in the hyper technical definition of non-excludable & non-rivalrous or in the spirit of those words (charitable impact, doing good for the public at large, {strong disagree with nbaronia about physical spaces})
> > > b) provide direct benefit to Nouns voters by solving pain points in the existing processes
> > > c) introduce Nouns to new bidders and builders who can accelerate the memetic flywheel
> > >
> > > unfortunately, putting noggles on a website in the name of “proliferation” isn’t hitting any of those marks. it’s a cool idea, and i do wish the team success.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>