0xba2b9804…f09fsent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,841,982·view on Etherscan
reVoteWithReason from toadyhawk.eth
> "If you look at CC's budget and the popularity of the licenses and #CC0 online, it may look like CC is a huge organization with massive funding. The reality is we are a small core team of ~20 folks working with volunteers all over the world to make sure the commons thrives."
^ A quote from this thread from CC's Nate Angell, which is recommended supplemental reading to the proposal imo: https://twitter.com/xolotl/status/1686494261829914624?s=46
(If you have an hour to listen to the Q&A we hosted with him on TNS this week, it was also very helpful: https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ZkJzXjEBaNKv)
I believe strongly that Nouns should strive to be an active funder of Public Goods. We have funded Gitcoin in the past (twice), have donated to the Protocol Guild, and recently contributed to an upstart MEV relay sequencer; all as ways to support one of the core protocols on which Nouns was built: Ethereum.
This proposal to patronize Creative Commons, the guardians and chief proponents of the very license that makes Nouns *Nouns*, is therefore not dissimilar to me.
I hope this prop can be the beginning of a fruitful collaborative relationship between Nouns and Creative Commons.
*sent from voter.wtf*