0x8ac3ecf6…5987sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#22,295,824·view on Etherscan
God help us if we aren’t allowed to pass a simple prop for someone to check in on other passed proposals. Maybe we should pass that suit trait afterall. Excited for Nouns LLC
+1
> Even if I was of the opinion that Bix has the necessary demeanor for a role of this nature, which I don't, I've witnessed her be unreliable in fulfilling her promises on multiple occasions
>
> Setting aside those unfortunately personal aspects, this proposal - yet again - creates a de facto Administrator with indeterminate fiduciary obligations to the DUNA.
>
> The authors of the DUNA legislation have been abundantly clear that this is not how DUNAs should be structured, that we are creating unnecessary legal risk, and that we should pursue a different legal entity if this is how we intend to empower individuals!
> (see the Administrators section of this article: https://cowrie.io/articles/part-3 and the definition of Administrators on the 2nd page of the legislation: https://www.wyoleg.gov/2024/Introduced/SF0050.pdf)
>
> Rather than continue to play with fire, (by fire I mean agency & securities law,) we'd be better served to explore more robust onchain accountability mechanisms, like milestone based payments tied to propdates and clawback mechanisms along the lines of stream cancellations.