0xcb06bede…b9ccsent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#19,510,562·view on Etherscan
Doing good is good, appearing good is good too. But funding-wise, I’m not sure we should spend more than 1/3 on 'appearing', especially when it’s not outlined beyond merch & a video recap. I’d be much more comfortable voting yes for a prop where more than 90% goes directly to the 'doing good' part.
Additionally my hope is that our relationship with Sarah Culbertson is more of what brennen is describing, and less of a paid speaking engagement (where we as Nouns would simply be joining the ranks of Capital One, AT&T & RBC Insurance Services, Inc., etc. - In which case it's not about who we’d be paying, but rather the principle of allocating funds for a professional speaker’s fees that I'd find painfully not nounish).
Building wells is nounish, which is why I’m voting yes. Cautiously optimistic on everything else part of this prop.