0x1aa55a5f…bdacsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#21,443,065·view on Etherscan
@0xaE65...46c0
Hi 40,
You know I Always listen to your feedback and use them to further evolve and improve our products, so thanks for that.
However, one single NNS protocol user metric might be reductive.
What we set out to achieve with the last prop:
- Open and shared NNS: Upgrade to share 95% of minting revenues with Referrals and Resolvers.
- Community Level Domains: We launched .nouns and created an infrastructure that allows any community to have their own CLD already resolved on the entire NNS network.
- NOGS (taken from our last prop “NOGS near future is decentralized, with the entire nouniverse that will be able to vote on new experiments and integrated with other cool projects and partnerships, so that NOGS can be used in games, for tipping and even for bidding in auctions on selected projects.” : self-explanatory, of course being an experiment it evolved further.
- Nounish Card: supported BCard in their launch of the first nounish debit card powered by NOGS and Nouns.
These were our goals.
Then, we overdelivered with all the achievement listed in this prop, also delivering important assets to the DAO and every holder.
Always from our previous prop:
“NNS Labs's ultimate goal is to empower nounish communities and onboard new people in original and ambitious ways.”
We strongly believe we have, in fact, achieved our goals from our last prop. NNS adoption could have been bigger, but we decided to focus on the other products to stay relevant, and the NNS was the last product to be completed.
This prop will complete our vision also regarding NNS user base and will allow us to keep building the way we always have.
>
>
> my reasons for voting against remain the same. NNS as a protocol has very little adoption and usage. the previous prop delivered little against that goal. doesn’t warrant another $400k investment imo.
>