0xae65e700…46c0sent to0xb6d1eb1a…dab3·#18,774,736·view on Etherscan
(noun40 voting via agora)
i don’t understand disagree with most of the opposing votes. noun12 is voting against the current implementation it seems(takes voter attention, not value accretive to dao). both of those points are addressed in v2 (permissionless, has a fee).
9999 focuses on fungibility but i personally don’t think something like the redemption token makes treasury nouns fungible at all. it’s actually something super needed for example for The Prop Awards i’d love to advocate for the dao. so let’s say quarterly we want to vote for the top 2 props and the winning prop builders get a noun and some eth. in this context, because we don’t know apriori who the winners are going to be we can’t actually give them a noun they would actually want. this problem exists for nouner scout as well! it’s a real problem. we want a way to give ppl (that we think are deserving) a way to “pick the noun you want”. creating a way to give ppl the right to pick does NOT make nouns more fungible imo. i also don’t think swaps with a decent fee make nouns fungible either. if i sell my nouns on opensea and buy a different noun there that doesn’t require you posting a personal values based approval request to the dao and that trading ability on the secondary market doesn’t make nouns fungible.
krel’s point is around the fact that the two props didn’t pass so like did they deliver utility why the retro. but i really feel differently here. we voted the props down bc we didn’t like this version of nounswap and presumably didn’t want to encourage a dozen more props like them. but clearly there is demand to trade for treasury nouns. clearly it is getting interest from the broader community as well on twitter and on farc. they also ignited this conversation as well which is all real value. this team just saw a tweet from toady describing a real need and got a lot of encouragement to build this thing and built a thing that works. i think it absolutely deserves a retro and should get more funding from us if we want v2 to be built and i think we do!
very much in favor of the team continuing to build nounswap towards v2 and i think it would benefit us a lot (not just in the redemption token usefulness mentioned above but also in the sense that it can pull forward a lot of forever noun buying demand into the present moment by allowing treasury nouns to be bought for an added fee)