0xcc4fd6e3…0aedsent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#22,777,488·view on Etherscan
# Pre-Proposal Discussion: Stacking Treasury Yield With OETH 3.0
This is a discussion topic for the next OETH proposal to go up on chain, after these two failed to pass in Nouns:
1 ETH Test: Stacking Treasury Yield With Origin Ether (1 ETH>OETH)- [https://nouns.wtf/vote/388](https://nouns.wtf/vote/388) Stacking Treasury Yield With OETH 2.0 (300 ETH>OETH) - [https://nouns.wtf/vote/816](https://nouns.wtf/vote/816)
and these two successfully passed in Lil Nouns:
1 ETH Experiment: Generating Diversified Yields with OETH (1 ETH>OETH) - [https://lilnouns.wtf/vote/165](https://lilnouns.wtf/vote/165) The coveted staking prop (50 ETH>OETH)- [https://lilnouns.wtf/vote/203](https://lilnouns.wtf/vote/203)
If we were put the OETH proposal back up, which amount should we go with? The very first prop suggested starting with 1 ETH to test Nouns can safely earn yield with OETH, but that test is no longer necessary within Nouns as OETH has been well tested within Lil Nouns for more than a year. The latest failed proposal was for 300 ETH, but that number was chosen due to the amount of available ETH within the Nouns [treasury](https://etherscan.io/address/0xb1a32FC9F9D8b2cf86C068Cae13108809547ef71#asset-tokens) at the time of posting on-chain. Depending on the number agreed upon, we may need to put additional stETH through the redeem queue to have enough available ETH for this proposal, but that was not an issue as seen from props [810](https://nouns.wtf/vote/810) and [815](https://nouns.wtf/vote/815). The feedback I received was that the ETH amount should be higher, so I am starting the discussion with these options:
- 350 ETH - an option slightly larger than last time, maybe for those convinced the test within Lil's was not enough
- 420 ETH - an option for the meme value
- 1000 ETH - an option for maximum yield generation and diversification within Nouns, and for those who thought 300 ETH wasn't enough to make a difference
- XXXX ETH - another number not listed above that has significance to the DAO
On the next iteration of the OETH prop I will also include a delegation of xOGN to Nouns. I believe Origin's university governance program ([UGP](https://docs.originprotocol.com/ogn/university-governance-program)) could be expanded to provide DAOs, projects, clubs, and other non-university organizations a delegation of governance power. It would require a governance vote within the Origin Protocol DAO to get the expansion program set up, but I have already [started that process](https://governance.originprotocol.com/t/nugp-an-expansion-of-origins-governance-program/168), and would be happy to support it through Origin's governance cycle. The amount of xOGN delegated will be decided on by Origin Protocol's DAO.pre-proposal-discussion:-stacking-treasury-yield-with-oeth-3.0