memoscan

0x79b6…ca6b

All memos sent from and to 0x79b6…ca6b.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#24,823,380·0xf043ff21…f18b2f
Voting For. The utilization numbers are clearly very low, so reducing the caps feels like a sensible and precautionary step. It helps limit unnecessary risk without affecting existing users, which is important. Appreciate the data-backed approach here.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#24,585,076·0x395e7066…6488a1
Really appreciate the clarity and direction behind this proposal. It makes sense to streamline incentives and focus resources where they can create the strongest impact, especially with a broader Mainnet realignment in view. The structured reduction across these comets feels thoughtful rather than abrupt, and I like that there’s a follow-up plan coming to optimize redistribution. That kind of phased approach shows discipline instead of short-term tweaking. Incentive efficiency matters more than just incentive size, and this looks like a step toward long-term sustainability rather than chasing temporary liquidity. Fully supportive of this direction — I’ll be voting for.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#24,162,126·0x43ac869f…102a34
Voting FOR. Thanks to the Gauntlet team for the clear analysis and quick resubmission after the payload issue. Topping up rewards on Arbitrum and Unichain helps maintain healthy incentives, support user growth, and keep activity sustainable across networks. Appreciate the thoughtful, data-driven approach.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,984,402·0x4fa443a9…ac5067
Voting **no** on this proposal. While I respect Tally’s contributions, I believe the scope and budget would benefit from further clarity and stronger milestone enforcement. Hoping for a revised proposal with more transparent accountability measures.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,902,706·0xf6b8ed36…6c0ce3
Appreciate the thoughtful and data-driven recommendations from Gauntlet. The proposed adjustments to Collateral and Liquidation parameters across chains reflect a proactive approach to risk optimization. Raising CFs while reducing LPs—especially for assets like ezETH and rsETH—strengthens capital efficiency without compromising safety. Fully support this proposal. Looking forward to seeing continued risk calibration as these markets evolve. 🛡️📈
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,861,008·0x1ebe02d9…be9abd
Thank you to the WOOF! team and Gauntlet for the detailed proposal and simulation work. While I appreciate the effort and understand the motivation behind introducing wOETH into the cWETHv3 market, I have concerns about the timing and potential complexity this asset could introduce to the protocol at this stage. After careful consideration, I will be voting against this proposal. I believe more time and data are needed to evaluate wOETH's long-term stability, adoption, and integration risks—especially in a high-stakes collateral environment like cWETHv3. Looking forward to continued discussion and future iterations. Always grateful for the thoughtful governance contributions.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,852,288·0x80cd74c2…c71aae
Voting For this proposal — great to see continued expansion of the cUSDSv3 market on Ethereum. The inclusion of deUSD, backed by comprehensive simulations and Gauntlet’s risk recommendations, reflects a responsible and forward-thinking approach. Excited to see more utility and diversity in the protocol’s stablecoin offerings. 🚀
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,852,282·0xe45e9ef8…39d1ef
Thank you to WOOF! and Gauntlet for the thorough proposal and risk analysis. While I appreciate the effort and rationale behind adding pufETH to the cWETHv3 market, I’m choosing to abstain from this vote as I would like to see further usage data and market traction for pufETH before taking a definitive stance. Looking forward to continued discussions and developments. 🤝
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,852,231·0xa5be003d…ab522e
I support this proposal as a thoughtful and strategic step toward fostering transparency and decentralization within the Compound ecosystem. Initiating a formal RFP process opens the door for broader community participation and ensures that the DAO continues to engage the best possible partners. Looking forward to seeing this move strengthen protocol governance. ✅
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,833,983·0x991ffa60…a7471f
Excited to support this proposal! 🐶✨ Adding tBTC to the cUSDCv3 market on Base is a smart step forward—bringing more utility, liquidity, and Bitcoin-native value into the Compound ecosystem. Kudos to WOOF! and Gauntlet for the risk-aware design and thoughtful execution. Let’s keep building a more composable and secure DeFi future. 🧱🔗🚀
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,812,559·0x4f4e8fab…93c3ee
Fully in support of this proposal! Excited to see deUSD added as collateral in cUSDCv3 — another great step forward for the Compound ecosystem. Kudos to WOOF! and Gauntlet for the thorough analysis and risk assessments. Looking forward to a safer and more diverse marke
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,784,254·0x17791f10…bb3854
OpenZeppelin has been a steadfast guardian of Compound’s security, and their track record speaks for itself—zero protocol losses, dozens of audits, and responsive, collaborative engagement with the DAO. The updated streaming model is both efficient and aligned with DAO interests, ensuring transparency, flexibility, and accountability. Grateful for the continued partnership—looking forward to another strong year of protection and progress together.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,761,981·0xfec3eae9…6fab28
Voting Against — While I understand the goal of optimizing COMP emissions, the proposed reward cuts may reduce user incentives across multiple markets too sharply. A more gradual adjustment or further analysis on user behavior impact could better balance utilization and engagement. Appreciate Gauntlet’s effort, but I believe more discussion is needed before implementation.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,724,174·0xdaa335f9…aec144
Voting YES — Excited to see Compound reclaim its leadership role in DeFi. A lean, focused Foundation with clear goals, experienced leadership, and transparent operations is exactly what the protocol needs to grow sustainably and compete globally. Let’s build the future of decentralized lending
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,697,783·0xbc54c710…f60bee
The proposed supply cap increases are well-justified by Gauntlet’s risk analysis and reflect healthy demand across Comets. These adjustments help optimize capital efficiency while maintaining protocol safety. Thanks to Gauntlet for the detailed evaluation.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,677,027·0x8d567456…b5769e
While I appreciate the initiative to grow TVL on Unichain, this proposal feels heavily front-loaded in cost ($300K service fee + $400K incentives) with limited transparency around performance accountability. A $500K bonus based on a wide TVL band also seems misaligned with protocol efficiency. I'd prefer a more milestone-based, cost-effective approach with clearer KPIs before committing this scale of funds.
0x79b640df…ca6bsent to0x309a862b…c8c0·#22,653,892·0x4cbd3e31…1e9aa4
I support Proposal #444 as it facilitates the rightful distribution of accrued COMP rewards to users on the Polygon network. This action upholds the integrity of the Compound protocol and reinforces user trust, which is essential for the protocol's growth and success on Layer 2 solutions.