0xbf74…08ee

All memos sent from and to 0xbf74…08ee.

0xbf74483d…08ee·#18,872,300·0x3eb7640c…d6207c
RqInsufficient funds`pPPPPPPPPPV[a2߀aInsufficient Ether for mintingmode=blocknumber&from=default[PPPPPPPPPPPPPV[`lV[PPPPPPPPPPV[`
end-purpler&&As we all can see, Purpler, without management, becomes very inert. I think it's safe to call this experiment a success to run the first retroactive round and shut down the DAO after we finish distributing the grants. Thank you all for being here on this journey!
payout&&Time to pay the winners of the retroactive grant! I tried to make it here in as few tx as possible but apparently nouns.build can't handle 5 txs at a time. This proposal transfers treasury to our multisig. Cheers!
Remove founders allocation&&The founders' allocation has already been 10% for @ted and 10% for @borodutch for only 1 day (rounded to 0 tokens). This proposal achieves two goals: 1. Testing if proposals work here 2. Removing already unnecessary allocation notes that don't affect anything Unfortunately, Nouns Builder didn't allow me to remove myself from the allocation so I added @ted there when creating the DAO to be more fair.
Purpler is a DAO to help Farcaster ecosystem. This time for real. No extra layers — just retroactively fund the builders. That's it.ipfs://bafkreihd36g7jrkeofe3d3gy2mmivoe4tgki2pjr6idhlpthyn6l2hydnmhttps://warpcast.com/purplerhttps://api.zora.co/renderer/stack-images
The votes are clearly a hostile takeover by AI. We can no longer trust our fellow comrades in Purple DAO. From now on we will either have to always watch our back against the threat of machine-made knives in our backs or we have to end it once and for all by voting "for" this proposal.
Establish the rule of martial law and name 0xen.eth the undisputed dictator of Purple&&The emergence of AI-generated art has been a topic of discussion for several years now. While some consider it to be a remarkable technological advancement, others argue that the technology poses a significant threat to the art world. The threat of AI-generated art is ramping out of control, and it is crucial that we take action to ensure that this technology does not cause irreparable damage to the art world. One of the most significant threats posed by AI-generated art is that it could lead to the devaluation of human creativity. For centuries, artists have been revered for their ability to create unique and meaningful works of art that resonate with viewers on a deep emotional level. However, with the advent of AI-generated art, it is becoming increasingly difficult to differentiate between human and machine-generated art. This could lead to a situation where human creativity is no longer valued, and machines are considered to be just as capable of creating meaningful works of art as humans. Another threat posed by AI-generated art is the potential for the technology to be used to create counterfeit works of art. With AI, it is possible to create highly realistic replicas of famous works of art, which could be used to defraud art collectors and dealers. This could have a devastating impact on the art world, leading to a loss of trust and confidence in the authenticity of works of art. Furthermore, the use of AI in art could also lead to the automation of the art industry, potentially leading to the displacement of artists and art professionals. If machines are capable of creating art, it is possible that they could eventually replace human artists, leading to widespread unemployment in the art world. To combat the threat of AI-generated art, it is essential that we take action now. One way to do this is to ensure that artists are involved in the development of AI technology. By involving artists in the creation of AI algorithms, we can ensure that the technology is being used to enhance human creativity rather than replace it. Additionally, it is important to establish clear guidelines and regulations around the use of AI in the art world. This could include requirements for labeling AI-generated art, so that viewers are aware that they are looking at a machine-generated work of art. It could also involve the establishment of legal protections for artists, ensuring that they are not replaced by machines in the art industry. In conclusion, the threat of AI-generated art is ramping out of control, and it is imperative that we take action now to mitigate the potential damage to the art world. By involving artists in the development of AI technology, establishing clear guidelines and regulations around the use of AI in art, and providing legal protections for artists, we can ensure that AI technology is being used to enhance human creativity rather than replace it. **We must act now**. Elect 0xen.eth as a sole dictator to lead us towards the brighter future and use the Purple DAO funds to combat the AI threat to Farcaster art. Vote today. Don't delay.
Alright, alright, I still don't like the proposal due to the lack of small enough scope that can be delivered. So far everything is so ephemeral that I predict no results will come out of this 2 weeks after the start. But hey, let's go bold. I'm going to vote for rage quitting like crazy in case we don't see a working product in 2 weeks and every day during the 2 weeks without us being able to test the thing being built in production will make me want to rage quit even more 😈😈😈 Alex, make sure to deliver, I want this to succeed even though I'm skeptical.
Jam’s goal is to proliferate and expand the Farcaster protocol, Warpcast app and ecosystem.ipfs://bafybeiecba4mzd5lu7babb5m3chjlbbnimrr524y3vcyaeaymdgmyxo36ehttps://api.zora.co/renderer/stack-images