0x62448568…9229sent to0x1758bf7f…eb0e·#24,411,112·view on Etherscan
The precession of Zodiac is 1 degree every 72 years, thus 360 degrees in 25920 years. If you divide 25920 by 666 times 3 you get 13. Many have suggested the Zodiac is actually 13 constellations. 28 days times 13, is 364, which fits well with a year. Many have suggested there was originally 13 months, not 12. What if the magnetic pole moves in a pentagram around the polar circle with a cycle that is 666 years, and 3 such cycles per 2000 year period?
The current pole shift across the arctic circle, is of course a perfect fit with a straight line. It is not entirely unreasonable the shifts tend to form straight lines. If they do, they would possibly tend to form some repeated structure. This is also not entirely unreasonable.
It can be noted the White House is built architecturally as one node in a pentagram. It is not very unreasonable there is groups high up in a global hierarchy who understand the astronomy of cross-polar circle pole shifts well, why would there not be. People in the dominance hierarchy (or, in chimpanzees or gorillas or horses or wolves, members in it) do not mix territorially between the top and bottom much. It is stratified. There is spontaneous, reflexive (whether people want to or not to some extent) contempt downwards and anxiety upwards. There is a monopoly on territorial control at the top of the pecking order, and for a memetic species this extends to memes, ideas. This is natural biology.
There is some more data which is from a lake in Canada, magnetic clay particles and it looks at how these align during sedimentation of them onto the bottom (they dig downwards to see older magnetic field orientation), and note that such data is a bit messy (disturbances geologically like earthquakes can have disturbed the orientation). The result is not entirely unlike a 666 year cycle, but it does not fit perfectly either. But I think the fact that 666*3 times the number of constellations often said to be the real Zodiac, 13 (which is a prime number, so indivisible and many cycles including resonance patterns in electronics boil down to indivisible periods &).
So, this is a wild guess. I mean, it is anyone s guess what the fuck the pole is doing. I have not seen any convincing explanation from anyone, so I just speculate myself. To me, this is fairly reasonable. Note that 3, 5 and 13 are all prime numbers (so they re indivisible, and lowest level of cycles and such tend to be indivisible since they cannot be reduced more, I think, that s why prime numbers show up here and there, I assume). In harmonics in music, only prime numbers are new tones, the other intervals just shift octave.
What happened 666 years ago? The black death. And, if you read Hecker from 1833 there was some peculiarities then.