memoscan

0x1758…eb0e

All memos sent from and to 0x1758…eb0e.
0x62448568…9229sent to0x1758bf7f…eb0e·#24,471,915·0x2eb5a807…1ba217
Asymmetry in tidal effect on Earth core from Moon-Venus interaction causes magnetic axis deviation in "tug of war"? Space is filled with a subatomic particle medium. Like in any medium, water, air, anything else, attraction and repulsion happens from pressure gradients in the medium. In any medium, pressure gradients can form from both flux or waves interacting. In any medium, vortices in opposite direction attract, and in the same direction repel. In the solar system, the sun has a vortex around it in the subatomic particle medium, and the planets move with it. The planets have vortices in the opposite direction to the sun. Moons, opposite directions to planets. Vortices interact with one another based on scale. If the difference in radius is large, the smaller vortex does not feel the curvature of the larger vortex, so it does not feel what way to align in, so there is no force. Venus is repelled by the Earth but attracted by the Moon. This attraction is stronger if the Earth s vortex axis is aligned the most with Venus vortex axis. The Earth s vortex axis is generated (probably) by the Earth s core, and the core itself can deviate from the center of the planet, and thus move the vortex axis outwards radially. The asymmetric pull of the Earth-Venus interaction, accelerates the body of the Earth in the direction of the Earth s vortex axis, thus causing the Earth s core to move towards the center (as it moves towards the center it accelerates the rotation of the Earth), and onwards to the opposite side. As the core moves, and the vortex axis with it, the pull starts to happen from the other side instead. This accelerates the Earth in the other direction, thus decelerating it from the previous. The result is a continuous oscillation between two poles, more or less (imperfect, but the force favors something similar to a back and forth. From geomagnetic data from the past centuries and millennia it seems to happen rather frequently, up to a few times per millennium.
0x62448568…9229sent to0x1758bf7f…eb0e·#24,411,112·0x0718f6d9…e3c86b
The precession of Zodiac is 1 degree every 72 years, thus 360 degrees in 25920 years. If you divide 25920 by 666 times 3 you get 13. Many have suggested the Zodiac is actually 13 constellations. 28 days times 13, is 364, which fits well with a year. Many have suggested there was originally 13 months, not 12. What if the magnetic pole moves in a pentagram around the polar circle with a cycle that is 666 years, and 3 such cycles per 2000 year period? The current pole shift  across the arctic circle, is of course a perfect fit with a straight line. It is not entirely unreasonable the shifts tend to form straight lines. If they do, they would possibly tend to form some repeated structure. This is also not entirely unreasonable. It can be noted the White House is built architecturally as one node in a pentagram. It is not very unreasonable there is groups high up in a global hierarchy who understand the astronomy of cross-polar circle pole shifts well, why would there not be. People in the dominance hierarchy (or, in chimpanzees or gorillas or horses or wolves, members in it) do not mix territorially between the top and bottom much. It is stratified. There is spontaneous, reflexive (whether people want to or not to some extent) contempt downwards and anxiety upwards. There is a monopoly on territorial control at the top of the pecking order, and for a memetic species this extends to memes, ideas. This is natural biology. There is some more data which is from a lake in Canada, magnetic clay particles and it looks at how these align during sedimentation of them onto the bottom (they dig downwards to see older magnetic field orientation), and note that such data is a bit messy (disturbances geologically like earthquakes can have disturbed the orientation). The result is not entirely unlike a 666 year cycle, but it does not fit perfectly either. But I think the fact that 666*3 times the number of constellations often said to be the real Zodiac, 13 (which is a prime number, so indivisible and many cycles including resonance patterns in electronics boil down to indivisible periods &). So, this is a wild guess. I mean, it is anyone s guess what the fuck the pole is doing. I have not seen any convincing explanation from anyone, so I just speculate myself. To me, this is fairly reasonable. Note that 3, 5 and 13 are all prime numbers (so they re indivisible, and lowest level of cycles and such tend to be indivisible since they cannot be reduced more, I think, that s why prime numbers  show up here and there, I assume). In harmonics in music, only prime numbers are new tones, the other intervals just shift octave. What happened 666 years ago? The black death. And, if you read Hecker from 1833 there was some peculiarities then.
0x62448568…9229sent to0x1758bf7f…eb0e·#24,396,843·0x30063f94…909c4b
# "Exclusion zone" is ordered diamagnetically by 1 nm thick "adsorbate" fourth phase of water Gerald Pollack has proven that a magnet will order  water, and reasonably this is diamagnetic ordering as the water will form magnetic field that opposes the magnet, and when it does so, the molecules will magnetically align and order from that. The exact molecular structure is known from McGeoch s diffraction photographs, it is like ice but each layer shifted one oxygen relative to the layer above and below. This ordered water  that excludes particles is upwards 0.3 mm. Gerald Pollack s data also show a release of hydrogen ions that spreads outwards up to 10 mm, that lands at a pH of 5.5. Gerald Pollack has also shown magnetic effects that presumably come from the adsorbed water, such as the water bridge, and suggested the exclusion zone  is in a fourth phase  of water, where each ice layer was shifted half an oxygen atom, and the hydrogen ions between each layer expelled. It can be known the exclusion zone  is not this phase, because it releases 250000 times less hydrogen ions than this phase would. But if only one 250000th of the exclusion zone  is fourth phase , you get, well, the right amount of hydrogen ions released. You then have roughly 1 nm of the phase, and this happens to be what conventional science says is how thick adsorbed water is. Conventional science says that 1 nm of adsorbed water looks different from the rest of the liquid water, and thee exclusion zone  does not, given the things they look at. Then when you add the electricity to the water beakers above, the H+ that is released from the adsorbed water (the fourth phase , 1 nano-meter thick, 3 atomic layers) will start to flow (and be consumed to produce water at one side, while OH- in adsorbate is oxidized to release electrons) and this generates an electromagnetic field which is amplified in the ferromagnetic fourth phase, like an electromagnet, and this lets it magnetically hold together the shell  around the bridge better, thus you can extend the beakers further from one another while keeping the bridge intact &
0x62448568…9229sent to0x1758bf7f…eb0e·#24,375,260·0xb4e1db6b…b85955
# Multi-layer polarized water formed by ferromagnetic fourth phase  adsorbed water It is known that at surfaces water can adsorb to, a thick region (upwards 0.3 mm) of non-solvent water  will form, that excludes particles. Gilbert Ling described this as multi-layer polarized water  and Gerald Pollack named the region of non-solvent water  the "exclusion zone . Gerald Pollack also proved that adsorbed water released large amounts of hydrogen ions into the surrounding bulk water, and that the exclusion zone seemed to have a negative charge. Gerald Pollack suggested that the non-solvent water had the structure of compressed ice  where the layers are shifted half an oxygen atom relative to one another, and all hydrogen ions between layers have been expelled, and he named this structure the fourth phase  of water. But, the pH data from Pollack shows that only roughly one in 500 000 water molecules in the exclusion zone  are ionized. If Pollack s fourth phase  is there, it would only make up about 1/250000th of the "exclusion zone . It is known magnetic fields will also form the non-solvent water  region or exclusion zone . It can be assumed Pollack's fourth phase  could potentially be ferromagnetic, since it could have free electrons and behave much like a metal. It would fit perfectly if Pollack s fourth phase  is the water that adsorbs to surfaces and that it is only 1-2 nm thick (the typical thickness generally agreed upon for water adsorbates) and that it forms a magnetic field which diamagnetically orders the water above it. Gerald Pollack has observed infrared and ultraviolet radiation increases the thickness of the exclusion zone at sites of adsorption, one reasonable explanation could be the radiation frees electrons. # References Shalatonin, V., & Pollack, G. H. (2022). Magnetic fields induce exclusion zones in water. PloS one, 17(5), e0268747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268747