Asymmetry in tidal effect on Earth core from Moon-Venus interaction causes magnetic axis deviation in "tug of war"?
Space is filled with a subatomic particle medium. Like in any medium, water, air, anything else, attraction and repulsion happens from pressure gradients in the medium. In any medium, pressure gradients can form from both flux or waves interacting. In any medium, vortices in opposite direction attract, and in the same direction repel. In the solar system, the sun has a vortex around it in the subatomic particle medium, and the planets move with it. The planets have vortices in the opposite direction to the sun. Moons, opposite directions to planets. Vortices interact with one another based on scale. If the difference in radius is large, the smaller vortex does not feel the curvature of the larger vortex, so it does not feel what way to align in, so there is no force. Venus is repelled by the Earth but attracted by the Moon. This attraction is stronger if the Earth s vortex axis is aligned the most with Venus vortex axis. The Earth s vortex axis is generated (probably) by the Earth s core, and the core itself can deviate from the center of the planet, and thus move the vortex axis outwards radially. The asymmetric pull of the Earth-Venus interaction, accelerates the body of the Earth in the direction of the Earth s vortex axis, thus causing the Earth s core to move towards the center (as it moves towards the center it accelerates the rotation of the Earth), and onwards to the opposite side. As the core moves, and the vortex axis with it, the pull starts to happen from the other side instead. This accelerates the Earth in the other direction, thus decelerating it from the previous. The result is a continuous oscillation between two poles, more or less (imperfect, but the force favors something similar to a back and forth. From geomagnetic data from the past centuries and millennia it seems to happen rather frequently, up to a few times per millennium.
Space is nothing, or space is something?
The dominant model in astronomy is that space is nothing, and therefore, it does not bend light. Dominant models spread by genetic imperatives such as food, sex and territorial dominance, where intellect is one imperative but it is not the dominant one. Science was a method of selection of ideas where it should select only by intellect, but, in reality this is not what ideas select by, so a group claiming to be operating by scientific method for selecting belief, is in fact operating by the human condition, and this is why you get "scientism" and the craziness of people who fanatically claim to "be science", a delusion really. In this "scientism" (i.e., people believing they can actually be "rational" just by wanting to really badly, even though their instincts do not care about that), anything that could not be easily explained has typically been replaced by "nothing". God was replaced by nothing. From "God created the universe" to "nothing created the universe". Etc. "Nothing", which cannot actually exist, does exist in "scientism". The idea that space was something, and that this provides a medium for waves (waves being by definition perturburations in a medium, i.e., something) was replaced by "nothing" by "scientism". Believers in scientism who decided space is nothing (which is, well, a ridiculous belief) had to believe that what they saw in the sky was light that had not been affected in any way, such as bent or such (they made the occassional exception where they really really had to, such as the effect near stars... i.e., they introduce contradictions in their model and underlying premises as there were some things they could not manage to ignore). Thus, parallax, was simple straight line geometry, and from that the stars had to be really far away. If, instead, you consider the model where space is something, and not nothing, it bends light. A solar system, behaves like a spherical gradient-index (GRIN) lens is made of concentric shells with gradually varying refractive index. The index is lowest at the center and increases toward the outer edge, following a logarithmic profile. Objects seen through the lens appear compressed toward the center and smaller than they really are. This applies whether the observer is outside looking in, or inside looking out. If the sun had a binary companion star, any planet within that binary system would be compressed towards the center, and any parallax between the binary star and background stars would be reduced even more than what parallax normally is by our solar system: our companion star would appear further away, even compared to other stars, than it is. If our binary star had a barycenter around one of its larger planets, a gas giant, this barycenter would not be compressed, since it is the system as a whole moving. The gas giant would appear close to the star. It would orbit the star with the period of the barycenter. We would be able to see our own orbit around the binary star in ways similar to our orbit around our sun, but slower. Each "month" in the binary orbit, the sun would rise in a new constellation at a certain time of the year, just as it rises in a new constellation every month of the year. The spectrum from our binary star, would be that of a nearby star, i.e., it would have strong enough signal that it could be contrasted to the background radiation of the interstellar space medium, and would lack hydrogen wavelengths.
# Spherical Gradient-Index Lens
## The Lens
A spherical gradient-index (GRIN) lens is made of concentric shells, each with a slightly different refractive index. The refractive index is lowest at the center and increases toward the outer edge, following a logarithmic profile. The total variation is very small on the order of the difference between air and vacuum.
Because light bends toward regions of higher refractive index, this gradient causes rays to curve outward as they travel away from the center.
## How It Looks from Outside
When an observer outside the lens looks at an object inside it, the light from that object has traveled outward through increasing refractive index. The rays curve outward away from the center so they arrive at the observer from a direction that points back toward a position closer to the center than the object actually is.
The lens compresses everything inside it toward the center. Objects appear both closer to the center and smaller than they really are. The effect is strongest near the center, where the refractive index gradient is steepest, and weakest near the edge.
## How It Looks from Inside
An observer sitting at the center of the lens sees the opposite effect. Incoming light travels inward through decreasing refractive index, and the gradient bends the rays inward concentrating them toward the observer. The lens acts as a converging lens for incoming light, making the outside world appear magnified and spread out.
Because this magnification applies uniformly to everything the observer sees, it is difficult to detect from the inside. There is no internal reference frame to compare against.
## The Asymmetry
The same lens has two different faces. It diverges outgoing light (shrinking the interior when viewed from outside) and converges incoming light (magnifying the exterior when viewed from inside). This asymmetry is central to how two lenses interact.
## Parallax from Inside the Lens
An observer inside the lens, orbiting its center, can make parallax measurements of outside objects. As the observer moves along the orbit, the apparent angular shift of an external object gives its parallax distance.
However, the lens compresses all positions toward the center including the observer's. An orbit with true radius *R* corresponds to a compressed effective radius *R'* as seen from outside. The parallax angles the observer measures correspond to this smaller baseline *R'*, not the true *R*. The observer believes they are moving a distance *R*, but the effective baseline that determines parallax is shorter.
The result is that all parallax distances are systematically overestimated everything outside appears more distant than it really is. This effect is uniform and cannot be distinguished from the objects actually being farther away, unless the observer has an independent distance measurement that does not rely on light passing through the lens.
## Two Lenses
Place two identical lenses, A and B, some distance apart. An observer sits inside Lens A, near its center, and looks toward Lens B.
### Objects inside Lens B
Light from an object inside Lens B first exits Lens B. During this exit, Lens B compresses the object's apparent position toward B's center the object looks closer to B's center and smaller than it is.
This light then crosses the gap and enters Lens A. Lens A bends the incoming light inward, but it does this to all incoming light equally both the light from Lens B's center and the light from the object. The relative separation between them is unchanged. Lens A's effect is a uniform magnification that does not undo Lens B's compression.
The observer inside A sees the object compressed toward B's center, just as any external observer would.
### Background objects behind Lens B
Light from distant objects behind Lens B passes through all of Lens B before reaching the observer. Lens B refracts this background light, compressing it toward B's center. When the observer shifts position, Lens B and the background both appear to move, but the background's apparent motion partially tracks Lens B because the light has been refracted through it. The parallax between Lens B and the background is reduced.
### Why the observer cannot detect Lens A
The observer is inside Lens A but outside Lens B. Lens B's full compression effect is visible because the observer sees light that has traversed the entire lens. Lens A's effect, on the other hand, is applied uniformly to the observer's entire field of view every direction is magnified by the same amount. With no unaffected reference to compare against, the observer has no straightforward way to notice Lens A's influence.
The precession of Zodiac is 1 degree every 72 years, thus 360 degrees in 25920 years. If you divide 25920 by 666 times 3 you get 13. Many have suggested the Zodiac is actually 13 constellations. 28 days times 13, is 364, which fits well with a year. Many have suggested there was originally 13 months, not 12. What if the magnetic pole moves in a pentagram around the polar circle with a cycle that is 666 years, and 3 such cycles per 2000 year period?
The current pole shift across the arctic circle, is of course a perfect fit with a straight line. It is not entirely unreasonable the shifts tend to form straight lines. If they do, they would possibly tend to form some repeated structure. This is also not entirely unreasonable.
It can be noted the White House is built architecturally as one node in a pentagram. It is not very unreasonable there is groups high up in a global hierarchy who understand the astronomy of cross-polar circle pole shifts well, why would there not be. People in the dominance hierarchy (or, in chimpanzees or gorillas or horses or wolves, members in it) do not mix territorially between the top and bottom much. It is stratified. There is spontaneous, reflexive (whether people want to or not to some extent) contempt downwards and anxiety upwards. There is a monopoly on territorial control at the top of the pecking order, and for a memetic species this extends to memes, ideas. This is natural biology.
There is some more data which is from a lake in Canada, magnetic clay particles and it looks at how these align during sedimentation of them onto the bottom (they dig downwards to see older magnetic field orientation), and note that such data is a bit messy (disturbances geologically like earthquakes can have disturbed the orientation). The result is not entirely unlike a 666 year cycle, but it does not fit perfectly either. But I think the fact that 666*3 times the number of constellations often said to be the real Zodiac, 13 (which is a prime number, so indivisible and many cycles including resonance patterns in electronics boil down to indivisible periods &).
So, this is a wild guess. I mean, it is anyone s guess what the fuck the pole is doing. I have not seen any convincing explanation from anyone, so I just speculate myself. To me, this is fairly reasonable. Note that 3, 5 and 13 are all prime numbers (so they re indivisible, and lowest level of cycles and such tend to be indivisible since they cannot be reduced more, I think, that s why prime numbers show up here and there, I assume). In harmonics in music, only prime numbers are new tones, the other intervals just shift octave.
What happened 666 years ago? The black death. And, if you read Hecker from 1833 there was some peculiarities then.
# "Exclusion zone" is ordered diamagnetically by 1 nm thick "adsorbate" fourth phase of water
Gerald Pollack has proven that a magnet will order water, and reasonably this is diamagnetic ordering as the water will form magnetic field that opposes the magnet, and when it does so, the molecules will magnetically align and order from that. The exact molecular structure is known from McGeoch s diffraction photographs, it is like ice but each layer shifted one oxygen relative to the layer above and below. This ordered water that excludes particles is upwards 0.3 mm.
Gerald Pollack s data also show a release of hydrogen ions that spreads outwards up to 10 mm, that lands at a pH of 5.5.
Gerald Pollack has also shown magnetic effects that presumably come from the adsorbed water, such as the water bridge, and suggested the exclusion zone is in a fourth phase of water, where each ice layer was shifted half an oxygen atom, and the hydrogen ions between each layer expelled. It can be known the exclusion zone is not this phase, because it releases 250000 times less hydrogen ions than this phase would. But if only one 250000th of the exclusion zone is fourth phase , you get, well, the right amount of hydrogen ions released. You then have roughly 1 nm of the phase, and this happens to be what conventional science says is how thick adsorbed water is. Conventional science says that 1 nm of adsorbed water looks different from the rest of the liquid water, and thee exclusion zone does not, given the things they look at.
Then when you add the electricity to the water beakers above, the H+ that is released from the adsorbed water (the fourth phase , 1 nano-meter thick, 3 atomic layers) will start to flow (and be consumed to produce water at one side, while OH- in adsorbate is oxidized to release electrons) and this generates an electromagnetic field which is amplified in the ferromagnetic fourth phase, like an electromagnet, and this lets it magnetically hold together the shell around the bridge better, thus you can extend the beakers further from one another while keeping the bridge intact &
# Multi-layer polarized water formed by ferromagnetic fourth phase adsorbed water
It is known that at surfaces water can adsorb to, a thick region (upwards 0.3 mm) of non-solvent water will form, that excludes particles. Gilbert Ling described this as multi-layer polarized water and Gerald Pollack named the region of non-solvent water the "exclusion zone . Gerald Pollack also proved that adsorbed water released large amounts of hydrogen ions into the surrounding bulk water, and that the exclusion zone seemed to have a negative charge. Gerald Pollack suggested that the non-solvent water had the structure of compressed ice where the layers are shifted half an oxygen atom relative to one another, and all hydrogen ions between layers have been expelled, and he named this structure the fourth phase of water. But, the pH data from Pollack shows that only roughly one in 500 000 water molecules in the exclusion zone are ionized. If Pollack s fourth phase is there, it would only make up about 1/250000th of the "exclusion zone . It is known magnetic fields will also form the non-solvent water region or exclusion zone . It can be assumed Pollack's fourth phase could potentially be ferromagnetic, since it could have free electrons and behave much like a metal. It would fit perfectly if Pollack s fourth phase is the water that adsorbs to surfaces and that it is only 1-2 nm thick (the typical thickness generally agreed upon for water adsorbates) and that it forms a magnetic field which diamagnetically orders the water above it. Gerald Pollack has observed infrared and ultraviolet radiation increases the thickness of the exclusion zone at sites of adsorption, one reasonable explanation could be the radiation frees electrons.
# References
Shalatonin, V., & Pollack, G. H. (2022). Magnetic fields induce exclusion zones in water. PloS one, 17(5), e0268747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268747
Auto-ionization in adsorbed water
The oxygen in water has partially stolen the electrons from the hydrogens (giving it a negative charge while the hydrogens become positively charged), and the oxygen and hydrogen in water can bond to atoms on other molecules with opposite charge. Water can also exchange the positively charged hydrogen atom with another molecule, while retaining the electron (which was partially acquired by the oxygen). In liquid water, water molecules are bonding to other water molecules via the positive and negative charge of the oxygen and hydrogen atoms, and they are occasionally exchanging hydrogen atoms (minus electrons, thus hydrogen ions) as well, forming an hydroxide ion (that released the hydrogen ion) and a hydronium ion (that acquired the hydrogen ion). The hydrogen ion on the hydronium ion can jump to another water molecule as it collides with them, and if it collides with an hydroxide ion it can return to it so that the two ions become normal water molecules again. This mechanism of auto-ionization, as a building-block, is all you need to understand the role of water in life. You can use this building-block of auto-ionization in different ways to build an electrical circuit as well as a form of engine that does physical work.
When water has adhered to or adsorbed to (ad-, to, toward + absorb) a surface it can bond to, it will form first a single layer against the surface, then adhere to that new layer of water, and so on, to form a phase similar to ice but where each sheet is shifted one oxygen atom relative to the one above and below. When you apply the mechanism of auto-ionization within this adsorbed phase (which is similar to a solid but partially liquid, the molecules still move around a bit) you end up with a hydroxide and hydronium ion but only the hydrogen ion on the hydronium ion is free to move, the hydroxide ion is not mobile and is stuck within the adsorbate. Here, the building-block of auto-ionization leads to a spontaneous separation of charge between the adsorbate and the surrounding liquid water. The hydrogen ions, being free to move, will spread out in all directions by diffusion, while the hydroxide ions do not. The charge separation that forms balances out the diffusion (as they hydrogen ions are attracted backwards to the hydroxide ions) and an equilibrium forms where the hydrogen ions have spread out but with a limit on how far away they are from the adsorbate. The building-block of auto-ionization, when only one of the charge carriers is mobile and the other immobile, will spontaneously form a separation of electrical charge.
The electrical field from the charge separation between adsorbed water and the surrounding liquid water will, somewhat counter-intuitively, stabilize the adsorbate. It aligns the physical movement of the water molecules in the adsorbate in a direction perpendicular to the surface the water has adhered to, and reduces any sideways movement of the water molecules. Therefore, there is an increase in how thick the adsorbate can grow, the adsorbate can grow thicker as you increase the auto-ionization (by for example applying infrared radiation). The building-block of auto-ionization can stabilize a partially solid phase of water so that it grows thicker than what might be otherwise expected.
The hydroxide ion in adsorbed water which is immobile, can also release its charge carrier, the electron, by chemically combining to produce water, dioxygen and electrons. This frees the electrons to recombine with the hydrogen ions if there is also dioxygen in the liquid water that they can combine with, and this produces water in the liquid water while it consumes it in the adsorbate. The mechanism of auto-ionization as a building block can thus move water from one location to another by producing it in the new location and breaking it down within the old location (i.e., within the adsorbate). This process if it happens over a membrane will reduce the water in the compartment water moved from, and increase the water in the compartment water moved to. Thus, the building-block of auto-ionization can physically move water over a membrane (by breaking it down on one side and producing it on the other).
When the hydroxide ions within the adsorbate release electricity and the electrons travel to the liquid water and the hydrogen ions, the building-block of auto-ionization has been able to build an electrical circuit, with a negative pole in the adsorbate and a positive pole in the liquid water. This building-block can be advanced on by physically preventing the release of electricity until it is desirable (similar to how a light switch works). There is different ways of achieving this, the hydrogen ions can be stored away into a base (such as phosphate) and only be made available when the electricity should be released (by in some way reducing the pKb of the base, such as by hydrolysis of ATP which then detaches the ADP from the ATP-binding site where the ATP was hydrogen bonded with the stored protons as hydrogen bond donors, or, by inserting an electrical insulator between the adsorbate and hydrogen ions, such as a lipid bilayer with phosphates that store the hydrogen ions), and the access to dioxygen can also be increased by moving it in loops from where it was produced to where it was consumed.
# Auto-ionization in adsorbed water
The oxygen and hydrogen atoms in water are charged and can bond to other charged particles. When water is in contact with a surface to which it can bond, it will tend to adhere or adsorb (ad-, to, toward + absorb) as layers with a structure very similar to ice but where the sheets are shifted by one oxygen atom between any two layers. The water molecules in this adsorbed phase can also auto-ionize, but contrary to in the liquid phase the hydroxide and hydrogen ions will not both be mobile, the hydroxide ion is stuck inside the adsorbate and only the hydrogen ion is free to move around. The asymmetry in how mobile two charge carriers are will result in that the more mobile charge carrier spreads out in all directions by diffusion, a force balanced by the attractive force backwards along the electric field that forms. The electron within the hydroxide ion can be released by oxidation of the hydroxide ions, and if there is dissolved dioxygen within the surrounding liquid water, the electrons can move after the hydrogen ions (along the electric field) and combine with them as well as dioxygen to produce water (and if this happens over a membrane there is a net loss of water where the electrons and protons moved from and a net addition of water on the other side of the membrane). The separation of charge within the adsorbate also favours nucleation of the adsorbate, as hydronium ions in high concentration in the surrounding liquid water like to bond to the adsorbate, and the electric field perpendicular to surface of adsorption also reduces any sideways motion of molecules within the adsorbate and the net force outwards towards the bulk water has a stabilizing effect (the bulk water behaves to some extent as a surface as well). Naturally, and somewhat counter-intuitively, the charge separation can therefore favor the growth of the adsorbate, and as you increase the auto-ionization (either increase the dissociation or reduce the recombination, incl. when the charges recombined by first freeing the electrons), such as by infrared radiation to increase disassociation of hydrogen and hydroxide ions or by increasing the dioxygen concentration to reduce the oxidation of the hydroxide ions and release of electrons (where dioxygen is one of the products formed), you see the thickness of the adsorbate grow. The hydrogen ions released by the adsorbate can be physically replaced by another cation such as sodium or potassium ions, and the hydrogen ions can be physically moved onto a base such as phosphate from which they can be released by a trigger and serve as the positive pole of the electric circuit for electrons released from the adsorbate. An electrical insulator with selective paths through it can steer the path of the electrons, and the paths can themselves be machinery which runs on electricity. The trigger to release electricity can be the diffusion of the substitute cation along a concentration gradient to form an electric field analogous to the one formed by diffusion of hydrogen ions in plain adsorbed water. An electrical insulator with conductive paths where release of electricity is controlled by opening channels for the diffusion of cations along a concentration gradient, and where the dioxygen released during the oxidation of hydroxide is released into the membrane itself, so that the same dioxygen can be used in the positive pole reaction along with the hydrogen ions (that had been moved onto a base that could be a phosphate) to produce water.
# Auto-ionization in adsorbed water
The oxygen and hydrogen atoms in water are charged and can bond to other charged particles. When water is in contact with a surface to which it can bond, it will tend to adhere or adsorb (ad-, to, toward + absorb) as layers with a structure very similar to ice but where the sheets are shifted by one oxygen atom between any two layers. The water molecules in this adsorbed phase can also auto-ionize, but contrary to in the liquid phase the hydroxide and hydrogen ions will not both be mobile, the hydroxide ion is stuck inside the adsorbate and only the hydrogen ion is free to move around. The asymmetry in how mobile two charge carriers are will result in that the more mobile charge carrier spreads out in all directions by diffusion, a force balanced by the attractive force backwards along the electric field that forms. The electron within the hydroxide ion can be released by oxidation of the hydroxide ions, and if there is dissolved dioxygen within the surrounding liquid water, the electrons can move after the hydrogen ions (along the electric field) and combine with them as well as dioxygen to produce water (and if this happens over a membrane there is a net loss of water where the electrons and protons moved from and a net addition of water on the other side of the membrane). The separation of charge within the adsorbate also favours nucleation of the adsorbate, as hydronium ions in high concentration in the surrounding liquid water like to bond to the adsorbate, and the electric field perpendicular to surface of adsorption also reduces any sideways motion of molecules within the adsorbate and the net force outwards towards the bulk water has a stabilizing effect (the bulk water behaves to some extent as a surface as well). Naturally, and somewhat counter-intuitively, the charge separation can therefore favor the growth of the adsorbate, and as you increase the auto-ionization (either increase the dissociation or reduce the recombination, incl. when the charges recombined by first freeing the electrons), such as by infrared radiation to increase disassociation of hydrogen and hydroxide ions or by increasing the dioxygen concentration to reduce the oxidation of the hydroxide ions and release of electrons (where dioxygen is one of the products formed), you see the thickness of the adsorbate grow.
Water adsorbs to surfaces it can hydrogen bond to, and in the adsorbed phase the mobility of the ions that form by auto-ionization is asymmetric, the hydroxide ion is stuck within the adsorbate while the hydrogen ion is free to move. Thus, the hydrogen ion spreads out by diffusion, in equilibrium with the drift current from the resulting electric field (backwards towards the then negatively charged adsorbate). If there is dioxygen (O2) in the surrounding water, hydroxide ions occasionally break down into electrons, dioxygen and water, and the electrons move to combine with the hydrogen ions and dioxygen to form water. This consumes one water and produces one water - thus there is no change in quantity within the container. But this same process can happen over a membrane, into another container. If the surface that water is adsorbed to is permeable to protons and electrons, and there is dioxygen on the other side of the surface, protons will tend to diffuse over the membrane and the dioxygen and protons will occasionally accept electrons from hydroxide ions that break down in the adsorbate on the other side, thus one water is produced in the new compartment and one water is lost in the previous compartment. The same reaction that spontaneously happens within the adsorbate and bulk water in a compartment - when you add a separate compartment, will tend to move water. Naturally, if you have adsorbate on both sides of the membrane, the side with more adsorbate will tend to more frequently spontaneously produce water on the side with less adsorbate, compared to the side with less adsorbate. Adsorbate, like ice, is impaired by salt, so if you have salt water in one compartment and fresh water in the other, you will tend to produce water in the salt water compartment and consume it in the fresh water compartment. Likewise, the adsorbate is denser than liquid water thus an increase in pressure will increase the amount. The tendency for protons to move across the membrane (and thus for the likelihood that the water production happens in the new compartment) can also be increased by reducing the size of the first container.
The electro-chemical reactions in osmosis (as described above) require dioxygen for the positive pole in the circuit (where the electrons flow to). It is also symmetric, and equal amount of dioxygen is consumed on one side and produced on the other. Thus, it can happen back and forth. But what if you were to invert the architecture, such that the dioxygen is released in between the adsorbates rather than away from them? Such architecture requires that the membrane in between the compartments is containing the hydrogen ions (as they have to be in proximity to the dioxygen to combine with electrons), and that it is capable of providing space for dioxygen. You would need a base that holds the hydrogen ions, and some form of medium for the membrane itself which lets dioxygen pass through it while water cannot. With such a membrane, it can be assumed (for electron release to hydrogen ions on the other side) that the release of dioxygen and electrons from hydroxide would happen inwards towards the membrane rather than on the outside, as the reaction would be in closer proximity to the hydrogen ions on the other side. With this inverted architecture, the dioxygen released at one side can be simultaneously consumed on the other (i.e., it can diffuse freely across the membrane). This makes the dioxygen supply at the positive pole infinite or not a factor, as long as the quantity is high enough to start the process. To be able to move the hydrogen ions on a base within the membrane itself, you need to substitute it on the outside with a positively charged particle in equal quantity charge-wise.
To harness the electricity within this inverted architecture, you would need the membrane to be selectively permeable to electrons only where you place the machines to which you want to provide electricity. Thus, the architecture needs a membrane that is an insulator within which you can place your machines so that they run from one side and to the other, so that the electrons are forced to pass through them. You then have a membrane that is an insulator, has a base in it that stores hydrogen ions (on either side) and has substituted with another cation on the outside of the adsorbate on either side, and is permeable to dioxygen and also a store for dioxygen, and throughout this membrane you have placed machines that pass through the entire width of the membrane and that serve as conductive paths for the electrons.
In osmosis, the transfer of positive charge across the membrane reorients the electrical field to favour a movement of electrons across the membrane. In a similar way, your inverted architecture could have a higher concentration of a cation on one side of the membrane (like hydrogen ions in osmosis) and this cation would be prone to move across the membrane and trigger the discharge of electricity. If your membrane is only selectively permeable to this cation, you can choose exactly when to release the electricity - you simply open the cation channel. To achieve the concentration gradient, you would need the cation to be at a lower concentration on the other side of the membrane (just like the hydrogen ions in the case of osmosis are in lower quantity on the side water moves to).
When you discharge your battery on the side water moves from, and power your machines within the membrane, you will end up producing water in the compartment water moves to. To move this water back to the original compartment, you could simply reverse the process. But to do so, you would need a cation concentration gradient (just like in the discharge case, or in the case of plain osmosis). This cation would have to be at a lower concentration on the side water moved from, i.e., it would have to be another cation than the one that caused the discharge. And likewise, you would then need a store of hydrogen ions on the outside of the membrane as well, thus a base there as well.
Then, once you have discharged your cell, and then moved the water back out again, you would need to also move the cations back to the compartment they came from, so that you regenerate the concentration gradients.
Water adsorbs to surfaces it can hydrogen bond to, and in the adsorbed phase the mobility of the ions that form by auto-ionization is asymmetric, the hydroxide ion is stuck within the adsorbate while the hydrogen ion is free to move. Thus, the hydrogen ion spreads out by diffusion, in equilibrium with the drift current from the resulting electric field (backwards towards the then negatively charged adsorbate). If there is dioxygen (O2) in the surrounding water, hydroxide ions occasionally break down into electrons, dioxygen and water, and the electrons move to combine with the hydrogen ions and dioxygen to form water. This consumes one water and produces one water - thus there is no change in quantity within the container. But this same process can happen over a membrane, into another container. If the surface that water is adsorbed to is permeable to protons and electrons, and there is dioxygen on the other side of the surface, protons will tend to diffuse over the membrane and the dioxygen and protons will occasionally accept electrons from hydroxide ions that break down in the adsorbate on the other side, thus one water is produced in the new compartment and one water is lost in the previous compartment. The same reaction that spontaneously happens within the adsorbate and bulk water in a compartment - when you add a separate compartment, will tend to move water. Naturally, if you have adsorbate on both sides of the membrane, the side with more adsorbate will tend to more frequently spontaneously produce water on the side with less adsorbate, compared to the side with less adsorbate. Adsorbate, like ice, is impaired by salt, so if you have salt water in one compartment and fresh water in the other, you will tend to produce water in the saltwater compartment and consume it in the freshwater compartment.
Osmosis breaks down and produces water on opposite sides of a membrane through which only electrons and protons pass, and it requires external dioxide (O2) in the compartment water moves to - the endosmotic compartment. The mechanism behind this is that adsorbed water also auto-ionizes (just like liquid water), and the conjugate ions as charge carriers are asymmetrical in their mobility, the hydroxide ion (OH-) is immobilized within the adsorbate while the hydrogen ion (H+) is free to move, and thus the hydrogen ions diffuse out of the adsorbate in all direction, in equilibrium with the attractive force back towards the then negatively charged adsorbate. When there is an asymmetry in the amount of adsorbate on either side a membrane that is permeable to protons and electrons only and that water can adsorb onto (i.e., an osmotic membrane), more H+ will diffuse from the side with more adsorbate (the exosmotic side , the side water moves from). The loss of cations (positive charge) will favour hydroxide ions breaking down into dioxide, water and electrons. The electrons will pass the osmotic membrane, and combine with H+ and dioxide to form water (and this is why osmosis requires external dioxide in the endosmotic compartment). Osmosis is thus an electro-chemical system, that generates an electric current.
The cell membrane is how the cell tames the electro-chemical system of osmosis so that the electrical current can be harnessed. The cell uses an electrical insulator rather than an osmotic (i.e., permeable to protons and electrons only) membrane, so that it can control exactly what path the electrons will take. It uses the electrons to power membrane proteins, and this is the purpose of the whole machinery: to provide electricity to membrane proteins so that they can do useful work. It then replaces the cation concentration gradient in osmosis (the hydrogen ions) with two other cations, such that it achieves a concentration gradient in both the forward and the backward direction. This lets the cell move electricity in both the forward and backward direction (the electrons follow the cation, which in osmosis is hydrogen ions), i.e., it can quickly recharge the system again after it has discharged it. It achieves this substitution by moving the H+ onto phosphate within the cell membrane (the phosphate heads of the phospholipid bilayer), and replacing the charge with Na+ on the outside of the cell and K+ on the inside of the cell, in equal proportions, charge-wise, to the phosphate heads. This architecture, besides letting the cell not just discharge but also recharge the adsorbed water outside the membrane, also lets the dioxide released during discharge of the anode move (by diffusion) directly to the cathode side - the phosphate heads on the inner leaflet where H+ is combining with O2 and electrons. The dixoide is released, and consumed, within the lipid bilayer itself, and the adsorbed water surrounding the cell membrane on both sides prevents the dixode from escaping. The architecture thus lets the O2 concentration available for the osmosis be higher than that of the surrounding bulk water or medium, and, it lets the cell make better use of the O2 it has - the same O2 released on one side can be directly used on the other (it thus has to some extent an infinite capacity, as long as the quantity of O2 is high enough to start the process).
Water adsorbed onto both sides of the phospholipid bilayer release H+ by diffusion, as H+ in adsorbate is more mobile than OH- (and auto-ionization still happens). In lab experiments pOH of adsorbate shown to be 4 (with pH 5.5 upwards 10 mm out, and 0.3 mm thick adsorbate). The phosphate heads in the bilayer (the O- groups, i.e., deprotonated hydroxyl groups) will be protonated from these H+, and store them. On the outside, Na+ or K+ in equal charge proportions to the phosphate that stored H+ is what replaces the H+. The lipid bilayer is an insulator, thus electricity released when a positive charge is moved along concentration gradient (the Na+/K+ selective channels) is forced to travel via membrane proteins. This is the purpose of the machinery: provide electricity to membrane protein. The O2 consumed and released during the oxygen evolution and reduction reactions, 4 OH- -> 2 H2O + O2 + 4 e- and 4 H+ + 4 e- + O2 -> 2 H2O, is consumed and released near the phosphate heads, and can diffuse freely through - and be stored in - the lipid tail region, the center of the bilayer. The adsorbed water on top prevents the O2 from leaving the system.
The plasma membrane electrical circuit is built on top of the inherent electrical circuit of adsorbed water, which is what causes the mechanism of osmosis. THe asymmetry in mobility of H+ and OH- in the adsorbed phase of water, results in H+ spreading out by diffusion in all directions. If there is less adsorbate on one side of a mebrane than on the other, the H+ from the "exosmotic" side (the side water moves from) will tend to have net movement to the other side (the "endosmotic" side, where water moves to). The loss of positive charge from the "exosmotic" side, generates an electric field - voltage - and OH- in the adsorbate will tend to break down into electrons, molecular oxygen and water, and the electrons transfer over the "osmotic membrane" to combine with O2 and H+ on the other side, thus "moving" water by breaking it down on one side and producing it on the other (this requires externally supplied O2 on the "endosmotic" side). This inherent electrical circuit of water is why Sidney Fox's "protenoids" showed electrical activity so similar to the cell, despite not having any lipids (and thus clearly not lipid bilayer). The phospholipid bilayer of the cell is not producing the electricity, it is "taming" it. The addition of an insulator, controls where electrons can flow. The addition of the hydrophobic region also provides a way to control the O2, so that it does not diffuse away (and the storing-away of the H+ at the boundary of this O2 storage region forces the release and consumption of O2 in that position). And the Na+ and K+ substituting H+, makes the cation concentration gradient diffusion more easy to control. Na+ and K+ are larger than H+, more easy to selectively filter. And, they are two, providing one concentration gradient in either direction, providing a mechanism to also re-charge the battery.
The foundation of these insights is the realization that osmosis is an electro-chemical process, and that asymmetry of charge carrier mobility is the basis of it - the same physical principle that the transistor is built on (there, electrons are mobile wherees protons are not, whereas in adsorbed water it is the other way around).
These insights are built on the work of Gerald Pollack and Gilbert Ling. Ling, who invented the microelectrode and mentored Alan Hodgkin, devoted his career to defending the role of water and the "protoplasm". He did so at the cost of rejecting some contemporary advances, such as the discovery of the lipid bilayer. But Ling, from the work of Sidney Fox, that the electrical potential was not in the lipid bilayer but in th water itself. Gilbert Ling was right, but so was the "other side". Gerald Pollack advanced on Ling's work and discovered what the electrical activity of water was: it was a spontaneous separation of charges in the adsorbed water, where H+ would be released from it. Pollack saw this in his lab experiments, with a simple pH dye you see the H+ that has been released, and he measured the electrical behavior of the water during osmosis, and the fact that H+ was transferring (along concentration gradient) over the membrane from the side water moved from (exosmotic side) to where water moved to (endosmotic side). From their work, it was a small step to also realize that the electrical reactions Pollack had already noticed must happen, OH- breaking down into electrons, was also happening in osmosis and that osmosis actually only moved H+ and e-, and from there it was easy to document osmosis as the basis of most physiological systems, including the plasma membrane electrical circuit (an analogous circuit exists on protein, there ATP in the protein binding site is what stores away the H+, both combined behave as a base, and it releases the H+ when it is hydrolysed as it then leaves the binding site and is a much weaker base).
Osmosis, or "proto-respiration", is one of the most fundamental building-blocks of life. In the lungs, O2 does not get absorbed by diffusion, but, rather, it is produced in the capillaries surrounding alveoli, and water at the same time produced in the alvoeli. In the capillaries, H+ released from adsorbate cause net positive charge in lumen which propels blood, and an opposite flow on outside of capillary will bring back water produced on the end of the capillary (from the H+ that propelled the blood), while breaking it down at the start of the capillary (the release of e- from OH-). External O2 is required to sustain this, and it was shown in 1970s that ventilating lungs on a dog whose heart was incapacitated, you still had significant circultaion going on, the "vestigual circulation" they called it. Likewise, in the kidney, you have "repulsion osmosis" in the thin descending limb, the narrow lumen forces H+ released to instead diffuse outwards, across the thin epithelium, and you then have a separate loop to reabsorb the O2 (this loops water into the thin ascending limb and down the collecting duct, to be absorbed by pressure in collecting duct, so the O2 is moved back out of the tubules and brought via vasa recta to the thin descendning limb where it can osmotically reabsorb more water - concentrating the urine).