0x8ac3ecf6…5987sent to0xbebaf868…d741·#20,366,216·view on Etherscan
**@playdna_** - A collective of individuals collaborating on a mission to make Nouns playable.
**PlayDNA is FOR** with a 3-1 vote result. See below for our members' votes with reasons:
**FOR**
**TheBower.eth:** Personally I'm a fan of being able to swap nouns with the treasury. In my view it objectively doesn't make nouns fungible, it in fact incentivizes the opposite, as each noun is different and people have different personal preferences of style.
Also support permissionless swapping, much better than going through a vote every time.
**eusoujp.eth:** I'm still not sure if letting any Noun from the treasury be swapped is what we as a community want, but considering the contract "is a public good that can be deployed by any DAO," I think we definitely should fund the audit!
**FabValle.eth:** I like the idea of swapping Nouns, it can be a fun way to reward the owners - since they already bough a Noun and just want to have fun with a different one.
**AGAINST**
**joaoborges.eth:** +1 @stripymofo.eth
“I would prefer to see swap proposals that have a greater and more detailed reason why a swap is needed, versus a temple creation from nounswap, a style of awarding a swap would allow us to see and appreciate the action and contributions of people requesting a swap.”