0x8ac3ecf6…5987sent to0xbebaf868…d741·#20,319,431·view on Etherscan
@playdna_ - A collective of individuals collaborating on a mission to make Nouns playable.
PlayDNA is ABSTAINING with a 2-2 vote result. See below for our members' votes with reasons:
AGAINST
thebower.eth - My stance when it comes to clients is that we should work mostly on a retrofund model, the client incentives are there to encourage this already. In the past we've funded several projects in this category with most of having little traction and eventually just being abandoned. I believe it's important to see some PMF before committing any funding. I would've also liked to see in the any usage metrics and plans for user acquisition.
fabvalle.eth - Despite having a clean and well-organized look, I couldn't see a significant difference in this client that justifies the investment. As other similar projects have been made without much user adoption, I believe that without a strong appeal, there is a risk of ending up with yet another platform that doesn't get used as intended.
FOR
eusoujp.eth - The team got onboarded through a Prop House round and even though they didn't win, they went ahead and started building their project. Now, they're onchain looking for funding to keep going, and passing this proposal gives them a shot to overdeliver and show what they can do. Plus, it’s a great way for Nouns to bring in talented builders at a reasonable cost
joaoborges.eth - Seems like a reasonable funding request with a very experienced team behind this prop. Although I appreciate this milestone-based approach for the proposal, I strongly believe that future funding requests should be tied not only to new planned features but also to specific measurable progress/metrics in user acquisition. The world is full of amazing products that nobody uses. I am confident it will be beneficial to have more Nounish builders like this team experimenting toward such an important goal. GLHF! ⌐◨-◨