0xa1c0b11b…e1cdsent to0xb789eb50…10cc·#21,339,954·view on Etherscan
As no other DAO members have voted for this proposal, and this proposal requests the majority of the DAO’s treasury—particularly with the proposer owning just over the amount of tokens required to pass the proposal—I believe it falls within the guidelines of the original DAO charter to veto this proposal. It meets the definition of being a “risk to DAO resources.”
The proposer is welcome to resubmit their proposal with evidence that it is not simply an attempt to “game” the DAO’s treasury outside of the DAO’s mission. Specifically, if they can rally support from other DAO members and demonstrate that this is a good-faith proposal, I will not block it.
I appreciate your submission and also hope you understand that, in the world of crypto and within a DAO where token price and treasury are disconnected, precautions must be taken.