0xa1c0…e1cd

All memos sent from and to 0xa1c0…e1cd.

This exact proposal has been made before. I will veto again for the same reason. Reason from last time: "While the more equitable distribution of funds and the attempt at a good faith retention of a % of funds to the dao make this the least bad proposal of its kind thusfar the fact that it still results in people effectively arbing the DAO means that I can't support it. Moreover, based again on the criteria laid out in the founding documents of the dao, I will veto it as the arb nature strikes me as a "threat to the treasury". I would likely support a proposal that offered a rage quit like mechanism if it resulted in people forfeiting their tokens AND not getting more ETH out than they put in. " I stand by this. If a proposal was made that burns tokens during ragequit and results in a more equitable distribution of funds I would not count it as something worth vetoing by the dao's charter. I've started some work on this myself but given that it requires a bit of smart contract work can't commit to a timeline.
As no other DAO members have voted for this proposal, and this proposal requests the majority of the DAO’s treasury—particularly with the proposer owning just over the amount of tokens required to pass the proposal—I believe it falls within the guidelines of the original DAO charter to veto this proposal. It meets the definition of being a “risk to DAO resources.” The proposer is welcome to resubmit their proposal with evidence that it is not simply an attempt to “game” the DAO’s treasury outside of the DAO’s mission. Specifically, if they can rally support from other DAO members and demonstrate that this is a good-faith proposal, I will not block it. I appreciate your submission and also hope you understand that, in the world of crypto and within a DAO where token price and treasury are disconnected, precautions must be taken.
While the more equitable distribution of funds and the attempt at a good faith retention of a % of funds to the dao make this the least bad proposal of its kind thusfar the fact that it still results in people effectively arbing the DAO means that I can't support it. Moreover, based again on the criteria laid out in the founding documents of the dao, I will veto it as the arb nature strikes me as a "threat to the treasury". I would likely support a proposal that offered a rage quit like mechanism if it resulted in people forfeiting their tokens AND not getting more ETH out than they put in.
Thanks for putting up this proposal! I am voting no only because I want to see all funds distributed via prop house until our first round completes. Please consider resubmitting via prop house!
Fund 1st Headline Prop House Round&&<h1>It's Happening</h1><p>After much waiting Headline will be running our first Prop House round.</p><p>We already have a house set up (<a href="https://prop.house/headline" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" style="color: var(--text-link);">https://prop.house/headline</a>) so now all that's left is to allocate the funds for our first round. </p><p>I propose a Prop House round with 5 lots of 2 ETH each ( 5 x 2 ETH in prop house parlance). This round will have a 2 week submit and 2 week voting period starting within 7 days of this proposal passing (i.e. a total ask of 10ETH). For more details on how I see the round being run please refer back to the DAO's founding document (https://www.headline.wtf/how-it-works). </p><p>Funds will be sent to a 2/3 multisig administered by me (https://twitter.com/pbrianandj), 0xripe.eth (https://twitter.com/ripe0x) and AustinGreen.eth (https://twitter.com/AustinGreen).</p><p><br></p><p>Please feel free to DM me on twitter with any questions. </p><p><br></p><p>Let's disrupt crypto journalism my friends :) </p>
Fund 1st Headline Prop House Round&&<h1>It's Happening</h1><p>After much waiting Headline will be running our first Prop House round.</p><p>We already have a house set up (<a href="https://prop.house/headline" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" style="color: var(--text-link);">https://prop.house/headline</a>) so now all that's left is to allocate the funds for our first round. </p><p>I propose a Prop House round with 5 lots of 2 ETH each ( 5 x 2 ETH in prop house parlance). This round will have a 2 week submit and 2 week voting period starting within 7 days of this proposal passing (i.e. a total ask of 10ETH). For more details on how I see the round being run please refer back to the DAO's founding document (https://www.headline.wtf/how-it-works). </p><p>Funds will be sent to a 2/3 multisig administered by me (https://twitter.com/pbrianandj), 0xripe.eth (https://twitter.com/ripe0x) and AustinGreen.eth (https://twitter.com/AustinGreen).</p><p><br></p><p>Please feel free to DM me on twitter with any questions. </p><p><br></p><p>Let's disrupt crypto journalism my friends :) </p>
Nouns Builder Upgrade v1.2.0 2023-02-18&&<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/HrQKZMG.png"></p><h2><br></h2><h2>Summary</h2><p>This proposal upgrades the DAO to V1.2 to add several features, improvements and bug fixes.</p><br><h3>Airdrop</h3><p>Ability for DAOs to assign minters and airdrop tokens.</p>
HDLNHeadline is an experiment in decentralized journalism. We are creating a Nounish Media DAO to fund crypto journalists.\n\nWhereas Nouns focused attention + ETH around the ⌐◨-◨, we aim to focus attention + ETH around the creation of crypto journalism.\n\n⌐📰-📰
Nounish Media DAOsLi Jin's article the New Creator Playbook lays out how the web2 creator playbook (create free content ➡️ build an audience ➡️ monetize) fails:\n\n- creators are unsure if they'll see returns on free content\n\n- less well-off creators can't afford to participate\n\nNounish Media DAOs are a uniquely cryptonative solution to both these problems.\n\nHow it works:\n\nPeople with a common interest pool ETH into a Nounish DAO. For example: people who love cat videos\n\nIn exchange for ETH, DAO members get voting rights on the DAO's treasury which by social convention is earmarked for the funding of cat videos\n\nAs we've seen with OG Nouns DAO this pool of mandated ETH magnetically attracts creators (people who are passionate about creating cat videos can now see on-chain a huge pile of ETH dedicated to cat video funding).\n\nCat video creators then pitch the DAO for funding. The only string attached to this funding is videos must feature the DAO's branding prominently + be CC0.\n\nIf the cat videos are awesome, other cat video lovers will see them and be made aware of the DAO. Current and new DAO members will wish to continue buying daily NFTs to keep funding the content.\n\nIf the content is low quality or doesn't garner sufficient attention, the creators still get paid but the DAO runs out of ETH and ceases to exist (a market based curation mechanism).\n\nThis setup addresses both pitfalls from the web2 world:\n\ncreators are paid for their work up front so no need to guess ROI, you can see the ETH value of interest in this niche on-chain\n\ncreators get paid up front which means people from all economic backgrounds can create\n\nThe key to all of this is something fundamentally cryptonative: the trustless on-chain treasury. \n\nIn the web2 world of Patreon and Substack you build the audience yourself with no upfront capital. In the web3 world we pre-aggregate capital AND attention for creators on day one.\n\nIf you know me, you know I'm not a tech twitter think boi. I'm putting my ETH where my mouth is on this one I'm running an experiment to create the first Nounish Media DAO to fund crypto journalism. After the recent revelations about the Block plus the eyebrow raising coverage of the SBF / FTX debacle by most of the main stream media it feels like now is the time to experiment with a different model.\n\nIf you want to help me disrupt journalism and in the process experiment with the Nounish Media DAO concept DM me on twitter. \n\nWe’re launching in the next few weeks.\n\nipfs://bafkreifp5f4glfsome6frpx74pjgzhbrbuljvnefi5vszgboeuascd6oxi
Reposting from what I said in #nouncil: I am personally giga long Nouns x Dota. I was a bit skeptical at first I'll admit but it was our Dota team that got my brother (a perennial crypto skeptic) to go from "all NFTs are a scam" to "all NFTs except for Nouns are a scam" ... which to me felt big