0xb9ce0217…3c58sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#25,078,684·0xd1e15efa…aa9cad
@0x3229...FFC9
Once again, I respect your opinion. I respect both casting a dissenting vote and leaving your opinion. It is your valid right to leave an overwhelming dissenting vote with a large number of votes. To prepare for any potential grammatical errors, I personally asked the NOC Guild, which has supported me for a long time, to draft this proposal. I want to make it clear that there is absolutely no emotional bias involved.
I have stated since the very first proposal that you hold a different direction from my views. As I have mentioned several times in previous proposals, this proposal has very low financial profitability. Nevertheless, I have indicated that 33.3% of the total production—excluding the marketing quantity which accounts for 33.3%—will be returned to the DAO. This accounts for 50% of the target sales quantity. I have indicated that the remainder will be used for my profit and the next stage of the proposal. This can be said to reflect the opinions of others, including you, who left reserved votes. Low profitability means that the profit I should receive is also low. While it may not be possible to satisfy everyone, I have tried to find a point of compromise. To express the character's individuality more centrally, I included a magnetic, detachable Nogle as a prop.
Frankly, I have no justification for submitting this proposal. There is no validity to the work I have to do for low profits. There is no reason for me to go out of my way to set up a promotional booth for NOUNS at the Taipei Toy Show, which I already hold. I have been participating in toy events for nearly 10 years, so there is no need to dedicate that time to NOUNS. It seems no one cares that I voluntarily submitted this proposal for work that I didn't necessarily have to do. As someone who loves NOUNS, I hope the DAO regains its vitality. This proposal is already fulfilling its role. Sharing and discussing different opinions is precisely the direction NOUNS should be heading.
If this proposal is not approved again, I will submit a revised proposal. The schedule may be postponed and rescheduled for next year's Taipei Toy Show. Additionally, the 30% booth fee I prepaid will be added to the total, and it is highly likely that the revenue returning to the DAO will shift in a direction that decreases. To ensure the fairness of my proposal, I do not vote directly, and this account does not contain NOUN. While I could pass this at any time, I appreciate the opportunity to share opinions among the DAO.
- Duckhead
> Once again, reverence reduces hostility.
>
> If this venture isn’t profitable selling directly to the end consumer, there’s zero chance it can work with wholesalers or retailers. You’d still have to give them a fair profit margin on top, which makes the whole thing completely impossible.