memoscan

0x70ec…63e3

All memos sent from and to 0x70ec…63e3.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0xf790a5f5…1365·#19,041,458·0x71136e46…89ad6d
artist-program-⌐◨-◨This feels like a wholesome proposal, but my impression is that this will lead to an abundance of low quality art being created. We need to "do things that don't scale" with artists coming into the ecosystem vs. just handing out 100 small grants.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6131b5fa…37b5·#18,795,752·0x5090e384…1f94c8
{"Source":"dextools","AmountInUSD":"448.5529012795582","AmountOutUSD":"432.7128740692111","Referral":"","Flags":0,"IntegrityInfo":{"KeyID":"1","Signature":"R3LeebzEjPzTIYbd/wSSKRveUTUJ/Hf6eABi4mZD7Tx9WrDCqsS4EZyTErkTv5XX/twZjW5kLnJG077TlszGZxqKRWWbl6jgdpGgq9bMeF7qmaQC78LFhaOJ24bDmn1QO0RWiXWZdKG0vVV5NxBD/iv1AhzD15ur4C/jgNZvUDT4Gim91OLtruLHz1T1WsMT/wKr/oHLSCxK6YQ7icc5NR3XVp0ughToFL2dslJBluVCNl32gYOw+KgtI/heoTOztZqOH/VMgqjPS3i4MfS/QHRHZu8IY5xDCGsghGMVqt+0qVM/Cn7P/suWU/o5zKrgtuKIZivnFOcZhb7WJftBbQ=="}}
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#18,263,486·0xeba62780…eb0019
I'm with profwerder (see nouncil vote) on this one... I'm not opposed to forking. I think we should encourage folks who disagree with the direction of S3 to leave. That said, that shouldn't be a frictionless process, and cutting the threshold in half certainly increases unnecessary arb opportunities and decreases the friction to leave.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#18,263,466·0xb9f9dd02…db7eaf
If the answer to "Why should Nouns do this?" cannot be answered with something unique to the community/DAO, then we shouldn't do it. Unnecessary risk (even if small) and we shouldn't be *that* focused on treasury yield.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,734,488·0x9ca2c1e4…d70fc8
I appreciate the team taking feedback and scaling back the prop. 3 months is enough time to demonstrate whether additional funding will be worth granting in the future. *sent from voter.wtf*
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,628,040·0x57b533af…d4e290
I love Nerman, but this seems like an insanely high asking price to continue development on this project for only 6 months. I would support this proposal at a more reasonable ETH ask with a more granular breakdown of funding allocation. *sent from voter.wtf*
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,429,363·0x85ce19ea…299954
Abstaining from this vote as I don't believe the Nouns Fork should be implemented. I appreciate and respect all of the work the team put into v3, and expect this audit prop to pass, but the fork mechanism is likely dangerous for the DAO.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,396,424·0xb576a2b9…539dc6
+1 to Krel and Seneca's reasons. Budget is relatively high, but I think this has an outsized impact on the ecosystem and makes proliferation through TEXT a game we can start playing.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,379,744·0xa967b27e…528dfa
I'm generally with Hindsight on this one... it's a fun project, but the economics just don't make sense, and it's not a good enough mode of proliferation to justify the outsized per-unit costs. I MIGHT support a proposal like this if it was tied to a very strong, unique GTM strategy that would get Nouns in front of a new audience.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0xfb4a9654…df57·#17,343,571·0x7dbd2003…a7e6bc
Proposal thresholds are only important in a world with an abundance of low-quality props. We don't (yet) live in that world, and I think culture is more of a barrier to us ever getting there.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,274,427·0x08c638a3…6ff12b
Had this prop been for Nounish media in Chinese, I'd be more likely to vote yes. "Running social media campaigns" and re-purposing existing media doesn't feel like it needs 10 ETH/mo.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,223,739·0xfba8e0d6…3cc40b
I don't think the DAO has seen many (if any) detrimental effects from 20% max quorum. Our goal should be to increase participation, not decrease required participation, even for contentious props. I don't feel strongly about this opinion, and would be interested in seeing the effects of 15% max quorum, but if given the choice I support maintaining the status quo.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,194,669·0x3a9cfee0…a7142e
Gone back and forth on this one. In general, I think games are fun and a great mechanism for proliferation. On the other hand, games are hard, bad games could be bad for the brand, and I don't really see any concrete plans for distribution here (just saying "ads" and "influencers" isn't the best imo). I'm voting against this prop, but would support a smaller pilot or retroactive funding for a game using nounish branding that has already proven to be enjoyable (retro funding wouldn't be dependent on pre-existing distribution).
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,181,747·0xfff5f455…989e25
The only hesitation I have here is "why 40 ETH?". Why not more? Why not less? Where else is funding coming from? That said, imo the ask isn't wild. Great project, great opportunity to proliferate throughout the Ethereum ecosystem, very in-line with our values. Excited to see ethOS hit more phones in the future!
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,175,645·0x56d50374…4b68fd
If not Nouns, then who? If crypto advocacy is not Nounish, then what is? Proposals like this allow Nouns to establish itself as a positive force in the crypto ecosystem, from both an internal and external perspective.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,174,347·0xedfd3e7e…1fdc3a
First off – Tigris is the GOAT. Working with her throughout Explorer Grants was a pleasure, and her work is too impressive and fun not to be excited by. Tigris is the type of creator we NEED building in the Nouns ecosystem. This prop is very Nounish –funding a proven creator with an audience of other builders to build fun, experimental hardware that can be used for IRL proliferation. Not only that, but all sales return back to the DAO which offsets the prop cost! I'm excited about this proposal and hope this is just the first of many collaborations between Tigris and Nouns.
0x70ece45c…63e3sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,161,774·0x3ee19f1f…f7c2a9
My first thought when reading this prop was "what if the book isn't good?" Then I read the sample chapters and said, "okay, this is pretty good so far!" Still, I was skeptical. Why this story? Why this author? After sitting with it for a bit, I realized none of those questions mattered. We are funding a complete book, in the public domain, telling a Nounish story, for children who might (big might) now grow up loving Nouns. That's Nounish af. Plus, the ask is reasonable, and I appreciate the work already put into making this project great. Excited to mint this!
1-50 of 121