0x2117…e42a

All memos sent from and to 0x2117…e42a.

Would love to see a more focused prop. This is wide net of new products which sounds exciting but also means too many new markets to learn and tackle. Even as end user, am I all in on the slides, the bear, the plushies or something else. Whoever Des is using we should reach out, the quality being cranked out over there looks nice.
For - Wins FOR - 20 VOTES bigshotklim | "I am a big fan of all of the SHENNOUNIGANS that Gami brings here. Lets go" coolbeans1r.eth | "I do not see any real negatives with this prop 👍" AGAINST - 3 VOTES ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES# Nounworks for Nouns ![hand up ](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/BkBvLQBrMx.jpg) ## Nounworks is a brand building engine for Nouns. ### It is a physical goods / IRL IP and brand development experiment. ### Nounworks acts as a support layer for Nounish builders and the community. #### Nounworks is powered by Bigshot.WTF, a creative studio with over 20 years of experience building out consumer products and experiences for global brands, entertainment studios and artists. #### The goal has always been expanding and growing the Nouns brand by supporting our global community. This goal is achieved through the development of physical lifestyle products, activations, global partnership support, unique art and storytelling. Some of our work to bolster the DAO: - [Our ongoing NOUNWORKS deck](https://bigshottoyworks.my.canva.site/nounish-friends-2) - [Past events and activations](https://bigshottoyworks.my.canva.site/let-klim-cook/#past-events) - [Nounworks sizzle reel](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qalcPmRLi5E) - [Social proof via #noggleseverywhere](https://x.com/hashtag/noggleseverywhere?src=hashtag_click) - SnapChat filters [here](https://x.com/bigshottoyworks/status/1948143324596179146) & [here](https://x.com/bigshottoyworks/status/1844526960296460760) ![Nounsfest](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/SktMiOGIzl.jpg) # THE PROBLEM: **NOUNS** is one of the most unique, interesting, and exceptional projects to come out of the web3 space. While the things we have funded and people that we inspired are incredible, we as a community have very little exposure to the world outside of web3. We have failed to capture the imaginations of the world simply because we're not getting our stories, projects and message out there in the right ways. # OUR GOALS: Our goal is to build on the work that we have been doing with Nouns, Nounworks and Nounish Friends for the past 5 years. The Nouns brand is poised to expand out of Web3 constraints with our careful planning and execution. We will cultivate the Nouns brand into a quirky, family-friendly, easily recognizable positive lifestyle brand - think Sesame Street or Yo Gabba Gabba - with a mix of humor, art and quirky weird fun. We will achieve this by leaning into our unique experience and our deep connections in the entertainment and licensing spaces. In parallel, we will be supporting and engaging with other builders and aligned Nounish communities. This will create new engagement with new audiences and attract more new holders and active builders. # OUR PLAN: Our plan is to push the Nouns IP to specialty retail, gaming and entertainment spaces and beyond. We also will continue our generous and robust support of all of our builders, proposers and creators for events strategic partnerships and global activations with products, creative assets and design support where feasable or requested. ![JUMBO](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/S1pb6YzUGl.webp) # THE BUILDING BLOCKS: **Physical goods and useful practical assets:** High quality collectibles, plush, toys, stationary, IRL events and activations are the fastest way to introduce Nouns to a mainstream, family-friendly audience the same way that PopMart, Funko, and Pudgy Penguins built theirs. Product-first brands provide unique tangible touch points that help connect people to the brand. Simply having people ask "What are those?" and "where is this from?" ends up elevating Nouns brand recognition. **Storytelling and entertainment, tools and content:** We are building out high quality digital and physical assets and relationships that will allow us to plug NOUNworks into opportunites in gaming, publishing and other forms of entertainment. This proposal will allow us to build out the tools needed to launch a global entertainment-based IP and build out a licensing portfolio that will generate revenue and future opportunities. **Infrastructure:** When we establish an infrastructure that supports builders and the development of the Nouns IP as a whole, we all benefit. # THE WAR CHEST: By having a creative, production, operations and distribution budget for our products, we will be able to build on and share the project freely without the usual friction. We will be able to quick strike on any opportunities that pop up, as well as offer help to others that may need it. We will be able to ship products all over the world to Nounish builders, as well as provide consistently branded assets and creative help as needed. Those creators can then focus more on building and creating content in the most Nounish ways possible, while staying on-brand. They supplement their own creativity with recognizable Nouns branding and merch. This strategy adds value by giving tools to Nounish builders and facilitating memorable activations while helping to accelerate the prolifitation of the brand for everyone. ![image](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/rySHPVFjgg.png) # THE ASK: $300,000 (for an 8–12 month program) ## DELIVERABLES: Below are the essential aspects of building a brand that incorporates physical products. ***Workstream & Estimated Budgets:*** Total ask $300K Loose breakdown of numbers: - Brand / style guide & digital assets: $80K - Product development & manufacturing: $100K - Warehousing, logistics & distribution: $50K - Licensing, retail, events, trade shows: $35K - Operations, back end & CX: $35K - Social media and marketing - Community support and engagement on props as needed - CC0 assets and product files - Nounworks shop with gated pricing and rev share and links to other builder shops Above numbers are estimates; the program needs flexibility to move budget toward opportunities as they arise. ![image](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/BJ-cI4Yixl.png) ## Benefits for the Community: - Branded, high-quality **products** available to all builders for events and activations around the world at no cost. - Cohesive & professional shareable **assets** that are easy to use and utilize (2D graphics and printable assets, 3D media and assets for gaming, entertainment and 3D printing) - Comprehensive **style guide** to help present and place product at retail and media partners - Shipping and logistics **support** for builders and partners. - **Event** support, branding assistance, custom product and assets to make each event unique. - **Licensing / retail** facilitation. Exploring real opportunities to support other builders with their dreams # SUCCESS METRICS ## Return to the DAO: We propose a 5% royalty on all Nouns-related licensing deals and product sales generated through this program, paid back to the DAO. This includes 5% from any NFT/Digital collectibles and secondary sales. All physical products will be made available to Nounish builders at no cost for their own activations — this program supplies the infrastructure so builders don't have to. Royalties structured based on net revenue generated per year, for a period of 2 years from the date of funding. Royalties can be revisited and renegotiated before the period expires. ![NOUNSGG](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/r1uK69DLMl.jpg) ## How It Works: **Non-Zero Start:** We have many existing relationships in place with publishers and with platforms like Veve digital collectibles. We have a licensing agent ready who represents Claynosaurs, Rokimoto and Yo Gabba Gabba - they are ready to take Nounish products and the brand to specialty and mass retail, and international manufacturing and distibution partners. Activating this program pushes work that is already in motion rather than starting from zero. **First:** The moment the proposal passes, we go to work on the style guide development for licensing and media opportunities. The style guide and digital assets are built first to support partner/ licensing conversations already underway. This is a key step to any growth opportunities. The budget covers this product development, manufacturing, logistics, and distribution to active and incoming builders. **Second:** We begin development and sampling of a new Nouns blindbox plush collection, a medium size plush and larger collectible huggable soft sculptures. We will have a round of voting for the plush head traits within the community. We will start planning a sofubi (soft vinyl toy) release in Japan to build on the excitement of the show at Loft (yes, people are still excited about more Nouns in Japan!) Pilot and sample runs of physical goods are produced in small batches to test the market before any larger commitment. **Early development of blind box plush:** ![NF plush](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/HkdwU52DMl.png) **On demand manufacturing explorations like the Nounish Slides in the works:** ![NOUNS sllides](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/rJOUR5nPzg.jpg) ## PROBLEM SOLVING: 1. Nouns has strong **brand recognition** and impeccable reputation inside Web3, but almost none outside it. We hope to change that. This prop aims to bolster curiousity, discovery and brand recognition with the larger audience outside of web3, and introduce them to Nouns in familiar ways. 2. If you look at the type of **engagement** that Pudgy Penguins, Claynosaurs, Quack and Chimpers are doing on socials and IRL, you can clearly see the pathway to success. We are close to these teams, and even work directly with some of them and plan to engage with them for collaborations and co-branded opportunities. 3. There are many builders, but no real **unified system** for merch, manufacturing, style guides, shipping, licensing, or physical activations. Nounworks will become that system. 4. While Nouns as a whole is decentralized, and the use of a uniform style is not mandatory, some builders have limited artistic skills. Builders may want to utilize great existing art, swag and merch options instead of finding resources to make their own. This would **make projects feel more professional**, without any heavy lifting. # WE ARE POISED FOR GREATNESS **Nouns is a perfect collaborative platform for brands and partnerships.** The easy to recognize Nouns style and positive message combine to make Nouns ripe for partnerships. Co-branding and collaborations can help spread the Nouns message of good will around the world more effectively than building the brand solo. We have already collaborated with brands across industries and we will aim bigger with each potential co-branded opportunity. ![image0 2](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/rkTyIj3vGl.jpg) We want to explore the opportunity to incorporate Nounish energy into our newest IP, [Here There Bear](https://bigshottoyworks.my.canva.site/here-there-everywhere-bear): the NOUNISH EXPLORER program will visit people, places and things within our global community, here there & everywhere. ![Nounish Bear](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/H1YOq9nPfx.jpg) # WHAT DOES SUCCESS LOOK LIKE? After 12 months, we expect to have new product pitched and placed at retail throughout Japan and the rest of Asia through a combination of Golden Sombrero licensing and our many contacts on the ground in Asia. Focus is first on Yamashiroya and Loft in Japan to continue to build momentum and brand awareness. We'd be aiming for conversations with select retail partners in the US, such as Barnes and Noble and BoxLunch. **More elements of the inital year:** - **licensing** opportunities with better equipped & aligned manufacturers that have infrastructure and reach - active **social** channels pushing NOUNish Friends and other content - **builders supported** - **products shipped** - **activations supported** - **more countries reached** **This is the all-encompassing pathway to brand sustainability, executed through partnerships, licensing and co-branded collaborations, with royalties and funds flowing back into the DAO.** # This prop lays the groundwork for the best path forward for Nouns. ![image](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/SJWqPCPcll.png) ![NOUNS wall klim small](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/BJOFh6D4zx.jpg)
Voting for purely out of it is smart the allocated funds earn value while earmarked. Having it sit somewhere not earning/working is a waste. Wasn’t around for previous prop, would love to see a new stream with the capital that is working.
# Nouns x AI **TL;DR:** Proposal text carries real (if modest) signal about whether a proposal passes — a model that reads only the title and body ranks proposals better than chance, AUC 0.65. That signal *survived* the BreakEven regime change. What broke was the base rate. **BreakEven didn't change what makes a proposal good. It changed how good a proposal has to be.** Everything below is open: dataset, model, split indices, code. Please go check my work. --- ## What I built I fine-tuned DistilBERT on all 982 Nouns proposals, using only the **title and description;** no proposer identity, no requested amount, no treasury balance, no voting history. Just the prose. The question: does what you write actually predict what happens to you? Then I ran three experiments instead of one, because the first version of this gave me a misleading answer and I want to show you why. ## The three runs | run | split | test pass rate | baseline | accuracy | lift | AUC | | --- | ----------------------------------- | -------------- | -------- | -------- | ---- | ----- | | A | stratified random, all 982 | 50.2% | 50.2% | 58.9% | +8.6 | 0.648 | | B | temporal: train 1–785, test 786–982 | 28.4% | 71.6% | 73.1% | +1.5 | 0.651 | | C | post-786 only, stratified | 28.0% | 72.0% | 72.0% | 0.0 | 0.365 | "Baseline" is majority-class accuracy, what you'd score by ignoring the proposal entirely and always guessing the more common outcome. **Any accuracy number that doesn't beat its baseline means nothing.** This is the single most common way ML results get oversold, and I'd rather hand you the yardstick than ask you to trust me. ## What each one says **Run A — text does carry signal.** Holding the regime constant, the model beats the coin-flip baseline by 8.6 points, AUC 0.648. That's real but weak. It is *not* strong enough to tell any individual proposer their proposal will fail. It is strong enough to say: **how you write your proposal is not noise.** **Run B — this is the interesting one.** Train on everything before proposal #786, test on everything after. Accuracy barely clears baseline (+1.5) — which looks like the model broke. It didn't. Look at the AUC: **0.651, essentially identical to Run A.** The model's *ranking* still works post-BreakEven. It still knows which proposals are relatively more passable. What it lost is **calibration** — it predicts PASS 12.7% of the time against a true rate of 28.4%. It learned the old regime's threshold, and the threshold moved. Put plainly: it's a professor who learned that a 70 was a passing grade, then got handed a class where the cutoff is now a 90. He can still rank the papers correctly. He just keeps saying "that one passed" about papers that didn't. **Run C — I don't trust it, and neither should you.** Trained only on post-BreakEven proposals, the model collapses to predicting FAIL on literally everything (0.0% predicted PASS), which scores exactly the 72% baseline. Its AUC of 0.365 is *below* chance, which would be a wild result if I believed it — but it's trained on 147 examples and tested on 50, with one seed. The confidence interval is wide enough to swallow 0.5 whole. **I'm reporting it because I said I'd report everything, not because it means anything yet.** If someone wants to run it over multiple seeds, the code is public. ## The finding The pass rate before proposal #786 was roughly **56%**. After: **28.4%**. The BreakEven bloc formed because the DAO was consistently spending more than it took in. Whatever you think about that, the data says the intervention did exactly what it was designed to do; it raised the bar. And the model shows that it raised the bar *without changing the rubric*. The features that made a proposal relatively more fundable in 2023 still make it relatively more fundable now. There are just fewer slots. This matters for anyone writing a proposal today: **you are not being judged the way proposals were judged two years ago.** Same criteria, higher cutoff. A proposal that would have sailed through at prop #400 is a coin flip now, and a marginal one is dead. ## The tool I built a Space: **[nouns_proposal_check](https://huggingface.co/spaces/gramajo/nouns_proposal_check)** It deliberately does **not** give you a pass/fail verdict. At AUC 0.65, a confident verdict would be wrong about a third of the time, and I'm not going to tell someone who spent three weeks on a proposal that it "will fail" with that error rate. What it does instead: 1. **Shows you the current base rate.** 28%. Most proposers don't know this number, and it's more useful than anything else on the page. 2. **Ranks your proposal** against past ones (percentile — the thing AUC actually supports). 3. **Surfaces the most similar past proposals and what happened to them.** Go read them. That's the real output. One warning I'll make loudly: **do not optimize your proposal against this tool.** If you tune your wording to score well, you're optimizing for *resemblance to proposals that passed* not for quality. That's a recipe for a monoculture, and Nouns has enough of that risk already. Use the similar-proposal list to learn what landed and what didn't. Ignore the percentile. ## What this model can't see Everything that probably matters most: - who is proposing, and whether they've shipped before - how much ETH they're asking for - what the treasury looked like that month - what got hashed out in Discord and on Farcaster before it went onchain - who actually showed up to vote My honest expectation is that a simple gradient-boosted tree over four or five of those numbers would **beat** this transformer that read every word. That's the next experiment, and if it's right, it's a more interesting result than this one. ## Trust, but verify Everything is open. Not a summary of the data — the data. - **Dataset (982 proposals, pass/fail labels):** [https://huggingface.co/datasets/gramajo/nouns-proposals](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gramajo/nouns-proposals) - **Model + honest card with all metrics:** [https://huggingface.co/gramajo/nouns-proposal-predictor](https://huggingface.co/gramajo/nouns-proposal-predictor) - **Exact split indices** (\`splits.json\`) and **raw metrics** (\`results.json\`) are in the model repo — you can reconstruct my exact partitions and check every number in the table above. - **Space:** [https://huggingface.co/spaces/gramajo/nouns_proposal_check](https://huggingface.co/spaces/gramajo/nouns_proposal_check) - Seed 42, single run, \`distilbert-base-uncased\`, early stopping on eval\_loss. Will continue expirementing with AI x Nouns.nouns-x-ai
# Nouns Milestone Payments # TLDR I have a smart contract I have been testing for some weeks now in Sepolia for milestone payments. It has taken this long since I am doing legit times (waiting three days etc before cancelling). # Summary I have a working POC for milestone payments for Nouns and all subdaos. Ever since [Prop 831](https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/831), I've wanted milestone based payments. Upfront payments are great for CapEx expenditures and streams are great for linear based/time based expenditures. The only one missing was milestone payments to complete our arsenal. For now it is just the smart contracts since the frond ends have to be changed to support this new contract. I'll create a video how to use it via Custom Tx but hoping to get some frontends onboard to adding this as a choice. # Images ![](https://i.imgur.com/BvvsGrJ.png "Nouns Soulbound NFT") ![](https://i.imgur.com/gck1bsL.png "Active NFT")nouns-milestone-payments
# Nouns Builder Passport # Summary Introducing Nouns Builder Passport ⌐◨-◨ A fully onchain credentialing system built on Ethereum Attestation Services × Propdates. Builders earn milestone attestations as they ship. Noun holders peer-verify. Just transparent, composable builder reputation directly from the props you’ve delivered 🏗️ If you’re a Noun holder or a builder in the ecosystem, your attestation matters. Try it out and help us build the reputation layer Nouns deserves. # Link nounspassport.eth.limo # Potential Roadmap - Custom Soulbound NFT with passport stamps - Milestone Payments validated via Attestations - Custom share sheet and leaderboard - and more nouns-builder-passport
secret-ballot-voting-&-sealed-bid-auctions-for-nouns-daoIn my era of being more onchain. This still seems a bit too rich for Nouns at this stage. If this is an investment then lets do a revnet. Have we explored going halfsies with ENS, Gnosis or other big DAOs? (either grant or investment). Happy to connect bridges if I know folks.
So everyone is on the same page, family member said: true inclusion. accessible ramps, adaptive swings, and sensory panels are built into the same structure as climbing walls and slides not off to the side. engage all six senses Quiet zones and retreat spaces Dedicated low-stimulation areas fenced quiet corners, shaded alcoves. let children who become overwhelmed self-regulate Both cooperative and parallel play. Cooperative equipment (group seesaws, round swings) Tip: sightlines that let caregivers supervise without hovering
I am "for" something like this being built in Indonesia. I am "for" a CC0 design of something like this being imagined and compensated. Unfortunately, I am going to vote no. I have a family members with over 50+ years in occupational therapy with children on the spectrum and they are opposed to this design. I relayed the feedback to 0xishal. So I will take their advice and vote no.
Not inherently opposed to it, but 0.005 does seem a bit on the lower end. The last couple of days folks have been buying on secondary for 0.02 so there is a delta there that needs to be captured.
community-weighted-voting-and-proof-of-personhoodWe should be experimenting at this stage. I know Futarchy is a dream at this point. Anonymous voting with reveal seems the most approachable at this point vs full anonymous. Doing light KYC with Zkpassport seems aligned before sending a web2 company money for full KYC. Stablecoin exploration.
secret-ballot-voting-&-sealed-bid-auctions-for-nouns-dao I've been thinking about this for a hot minute. I recently went and chatted with the Shutter team (podcast episode incoming). I think we need some version of this. Human coordination overall is messy AF. Currently I am experimenting by being more onchain. Our group is small enough where biases and lines can get blurry. At scale you do have some level of anonymity (think cities). But for us its a bit too close to home. For example, I was recently told the only reason my prop passed was because people thought I would quit if it didnt pass. We should not be voting based favor trading or playing this level of politics. Fully homomorphic voting at this price might not be the answer like Mike said, making people more anon might not be the vibe. But something like what Shutter does at a lower cost seems appropriate or a worth while experiment. TDLR: private voting during voting period but reveal after voting is done. So you know where folks stand but people arent being influenced during voting period. This seems to be the best approach. Auryn is a respected builder in the space. And yeah 200+ ETH is a bit pricey for our current status but we should embrace him coming with an idea. Signaling for and willing to sponsor once this reaches a better state and solves some of the issues outline by others.
For - Wins FOR - 23 VOTES bigshotklim | "Kismet is an amazing, nounish community and will do a great job representing Nouns" davinoyesigye | "dope shterf" AGAINST - 0 VOTES ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES
Against - Wins FOR - 5 VOTES AGAINST - 18 VOTES lorenzos_spot | "“The free market is not only a more efficient decision maker than even the wisest central planning body, but even more important, the free market keeps economic power widely dispersed.” - Milton Friedman" ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES
proposal:-"smart-identity"-—-a-nounish-community-aware-ens-resolver-for-ensv2Will you name your smart contract? Is this handing the noun over to you before the work is done/completed? Maybe do a multisig if so or ship and then retro it?
Other items worth noting that I thought about today: - Brought in Morpho/Moonwell to the table regarding staking and leveraging Mamo (failed) - Potential Awaken Tax x Nouns (ongoing) - Podcast episodes on Nouners and current props - A couple of banking business services for DUNA admins - Gnosis card x Nouns (cooking) Not everything leads to wins but I try and put the DAO first. I appreciate all those who have voted and you all for entertaining my crazy ideas lol like Futarchy before the cool kids started talking about it.
@0x749B...54Ce oui https://www.enscribe.xyz/blog/naming-season-awards-update?utm_content=bufferf72df&utm_medium=social&utm_source=x.com&utm_campaign=buffer also on twitter/x. > > > do you have a reference publication where I can read about the $3k usd you mentioned? > Correction, since the price of ENS token went up its now $3,500. It is also all onchain via props https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/893
fund-public-goods-with-defi-native-borrowing@0xC7CC...7d87 I am a huge fan of Liquity and its licensed forks. I have been advocating for Nouns supporting or leveraging BOLD more as I feel it is more aligned from a stablecoin perspective than USDC. As for the DeFi aspect of liquity that is something I am a bit more weary of mostly due to the fact that our members find DeFi boring or not useful as a mechanism of funding things. But leveraging Liquity defi protocol is something we can explore as a group. Overall bullish on Nouns x Liquity. Let's make something happen! > The extra management from redemption/trove hunting feels like a mismatch for DAOs. Delegation can offset it a little, but does anyone really want that responsibility without getting compensated? (Imagine the positive comments if a DAO Trove gets redeemed 😅) > > ? something more passive where the market or governance just works out the rate. No constant watching or delegation hassles. Aave/GHO or Spark/USDS,no sharks in the pool, just order books doing their thing. > > That said, a Trove could have advantages if we upgraded the auction contracts to send daily auction proceeds straight to our DAO-controlled Trove, steadily pushing up the collateral. (not sure possible using Aave/spark 👨‍🔧🪠 > > It would mostly just be borrow/repay plus redeem any extra ETH, instead of those “oh shit bad price add more ETH” emergency moments (though yeah, the market can always bite. 3AC thought they were safe once too).
nouns-frontend-migration-1773376104327-frp5thStill formulating thoughts. But shooting from the hip. Eth.limo site definitely. Nouns.wtf site should still point to eth.limo one. So we retain the domain for normies and redirects seamlessly. Octant pooled money one of my call outs was this exact scenario. Funding for those supporting our open source software and our “tech stack” Based on where the world is right now we should go deeper on decentralization.
# V2 Proposal to Gift Noun 586 to Gramajo ⌐◨-◨ TLDR: V2 in the 3rd person. Different client. This proposal is being created to gift Noun 586 to Gramajo for contributions to the Nouns ecosystem. ![586](https://i.imgur.com/8RsQLYr.png) **Gramajo's Contributions** Recently got Nouns paid over [3k USD via an ENS experiment](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x97b1011ebe8253cc54876d79390b8927cfb72d0307b5c32009035f0fb656ff8f), causing a proliferation of Nounish sub communities to name their smart contracts. **Community Building:** Hosted Nouns Dinner [Devconnect 2025](https://poap.gallery/drops/214552) Hosted Nouns Dinner [ETH Denver 2026](https://poap.gallery/drops/226203) **Event Coordination:** Spun up two Telegram channels for event coordination at Devconnect and ETH Denver, bringing Nouns and friends into one chat and helping with onboarding at both activations. **Governance Participation:** Led the charge on moving Nouncil more onchain via Hats Protocol, contacting the Hats team and reaching out to every Nouncil member manually to airdrop NFTs. ![Nouncil x Hats](https://i.imgur.com/HGhbmTN.png) **Proposal** In recognition of Gramajo's diverse contributions to the Nouns ecosystem, this proposal seeks to gift Noun 586 to him. This gesture acknowledges his dedication, active participation, and the value he brings to the community.
# V2 Proposal to Gift Noun 586 to Gramajo ⌐◨-◨ TLDR: V2 in the 3rd person. Different client. This proposal is being created to gift Noun 586 to Gramajo for contributions to the Nouns ecosystem. ![586](https://i.imgur.com/8RsQLYr.png) **Gramajo's Contributions** Recently got Nouns paid over [3k USD via an ENS experiment](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x97b1011ebe8253cc54876d79390b8927cfb72d0307b5c32009035f0fb656ff8f), causing a proliferation of Nounish sub communities to name their smart contracts. **Community Building:** Hosted Nouns Dinner [Devconnect 2025](https://poap.gallery/drops/214552) Hosted Nouns Dinner [ETH Denver 2026](https://poap.gallery/drops/226203) **Event Coordination:** Spun up two Telegram channels for event coordination at Devconnect and ETH Denver, bringing Nouns and friends into one chat and helping with onboarding at both activations. **Governance Participation:** Led the charge on moving Nouncil more onchain via Hats Protocol, contacting the Hats team and reaching out to every Nouncil member manually to airdrop NFTs. ![Nouncil x Hats](https://i.imgur.com/HGhbmTN.png) **Proposal** In recognition of Gramajo's diverse contributions to the Nouns ecosystem, this proposal seeks to gift Noun 586 to him. This gesture acknowledges his dedication, active participation, and the value he brings to the community.v2-proposal-to-gift-noun-586-to-gramajo-
# Proposal to Gift Noun 586 to Gramajo ⌐◨-◨ # Background I am creating this proposal to gift Noun 586 to Gramajo for contributions to the Nouns ecosystem. ![](https://i.imgur.com/8RsQLYr.png "Noun 586") # Gramajo's Contributions **Recently got Nouns paid over** [3k USD via an ENS experiment](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x97b1011ebe8253cc54876d79390b8927cfb72d0307b5c32009035f0fb656ff8f)**. Causing a proliferation of Nounish sub communities to name their smart contracts.** **Community Building:** - Hosted Nouns [Dinner Devconnect 2025](https://poap.gallery/drops/214552) - Hosted Nouns [Dinner ETH Denver 2026](https://poap.gallery/drops/226203) **Event Coordination:** - Spun up two Telegram channels for event coordination Devconnect and ETH Denver. Bringing Nouns and friends into one chat and helping with onboarding at both activations. **Governance Participation:** - Led the charge on moving Nouncil more onchain via hats protocol contacting Hats team and reaching out to every Nouncil member manually to airdrop NFT. ![](https://i.imgur.com/HGhbmTN.png "Nouncil x Hats") # Proposal In recognition of Gramajo's diverse contributions to the Nouns ecosystem, I propose gifting Noun 586 to him. This gesture acknowledges his dedication, active participation, and the value he brings to our community.
duna-discussion@0xC7CC...7d87 Have we thought about Awaken? They just rolled out Awaken Tax for Business and we would fit this use case. I checked with Duca and he’s down to expand this service to us. Happy to work with us on pricing too. Just let me know. > Accounting Provider Update > > The DAO’s agreement with its current accounting provider concluded at the end of January. Throughout the past year, the team evaluated multiple providers in preparation for this transition. Two options are currently under consideration: > New Provider Proposal > $4,350/month > $425/month pass-through tooling fee > Total: $4,775/month ($57,300/year) > Counter Proposal > $50,000/year > Equivalent to approximately $4,166.67/month > A decision will be made after evaluating the cost, capabilities, and continuity considerations of both options. > > https://paragraph.com/@nouns/2026-duna-updates > > 👀 Are we hiring J.P. Morgan, the man to review our 30 transactions a month?
1-50 of 290