memoscan

0xe8d8…3f31

All memos sent from and to 0xe8d8…3f31.
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x6f3e6272…223d·#17,393,988·0x99ae0ada…b628b6
I love this idea, and while it's difficult to execute on, even a partially successful version could be a good experience. My only request is that the computers be in the shape of the glasses.
0xe8d848de…3f31·#16,451,888·0x232e117c…16ccdf
NounsDAO::_setVotingPeriod: admi`DNounsDAO::_setVotingPeriod: inva`DNounsDAO::veto: veto power burne`DNounsDAO::veto: only vetoerNounsDAO::veto: cannot veto exec`DNounsDAO::_setVotingDelay: admin`DNounsDAO::_setVotingDelay: inval`DRnid voting delay`NounsDAO::initialize: can only i`DRmnitialize once`NounsDAO::initialize: admin only`DNounsDAO::initialize: invalid ti`DRmmelock address`NounsDAO::initialize: invalid no`DNounsDAO::initialize: invalid vo`DNounsDAO::initialize: invalid vo`DNounsDAO::castVoteBySig: invalid`DNounsDAO::state: invalid proposa`DNounsDAO::cancel: cannot cancel `DNounsDAO::cancel: proposer above`DNounsDAO::_setQuorumVotesBPS: ad`DNounsDAO::_setVetoer: vetoer onl`DNounsDAO::_setProposalThresholdB`DRmPS: admin only`NounsDAO::_setPendingAdmin: admi`DNounsDAO::_burnVetoPower: vetoer`DNounsDAO::propose: proposer vote`Ds below proposal thresholdNounsDAO::propose: proposal func`Dtion information arity mismatchNounsDAO::propose: must provide `DNounsDAO::propose: too many acti`DNounsDAO::propose: one live prop`Dosal per proposer, found an alre`dNounsDAO::propose: one live prop`Dosal per proposer, found an alre`dNounsDAO::queue: proposal can on`Dly be queued if it is succeededNounsDAO::_acceptAdmin: pending `DNounsDAO::execute: proposal can `Donly be executed if it is queued`dNounsDAO::castVoteInternal: voti`DNounsDAO::castVoteInternal: inva`DRllid vote type`NounsDAO::castVoteInternal: vote`DNounsDAO::queueOrRevertInternal:`D identical proposal action alrea`dRody queued at eta`NounsDAO::initialize: invalid pr`@NounsDAO::_setProposalThreshold:`@ invalid proposal thresholdPPPPPPPPPPPPPPV[`
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0xdbd38f7e…0e0c·#14,894,853·0xf540d42e…4fa4a1
It's pretty wild that this proposal is just a youtube video, lol. Thats a first! In the beginning, Paper was always intended to be a resource of the DAO. We (the early community) didn't mint everything out day one because we naively thought that the DAO being the owner of the contract meant we could mint out to pay people whenever the community needed to. We did not expect the political winds would be so strongly against minting new tokens. Contributors are not dumpers. These people want to put their time into something that could be so big that the only rational thing is to collect as much Paper as possible and work as hard as possible to make it as valuable as possible. Contributors are the lifeblood of a project. We need them, and they need to get paid for their work. The power of DAOs is being able to reward participants with access to the upside of participation. We literally need to *WILL* Paper into existence as something valuable, and that is done through the sweat equity of the contributors. Hustlers always pay their debts, and it's time they get paid. yours truly, Dennison
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x80bae65e…a703·#14,800,612·0xfd8bf200…43f990
# PPIP - 6: Governance Parameters Update, Marketing Group Funding ![preview image](https://static.tally.xyz/3ae4b74a-3477-4125-8f8e-f2f63fb8fa51_400x400.jpg) # PPIP - 6 Governance Parameters Update, Marketing Group Funding (NOTE: there are no previous PPIPs, the 6 is to match current proposal number) ### Abstract: 1) Update the DAO Parameters to enable more participation. - 15% Quorum Threshold - 1 Vote Token Proposal Threshold These decisions will be reflected in the onchain executed part of this proposal. 2) Fund a marketing team to build the impact of PridePunkDAO in the community. This is Non-salary marketing fixed costs. This decision will transfer 8 ETH to the Marketing Team MultiSig 3) Take 100% ownership of all future secondary market royalties with 15% being directed to the Marketing Team. This decision will be implemented by Dennison Bertram off-chain with OpenSea and is a consensus decision. ## Details for the Contributor Marketing Budget: The Contributors are proposing a $15,500 USD pool allocation and 12 DAO PridePunks for marketing. This budget is intended as a soft launch with the intent on implementing high CAC marketing allocations. These allocations will be tied to a Gnosis safe which will be transparent and require multiple signers for distributions. ## Marketing Gnosis safe: 0xAfF8b9EAB9EB607583b90CFA9BCA0DB32A5C6280 ### Signers: 1. Lizo (**Li𐌶⭕#7025)** - Leading Community participant 0x20E4e9B5ceF818804e410265b8366270967Ab622 2. CitizenLev (**CitizenLev#7342)** - Tenured digital marketing expert 0x12F1835FdF7f45e1F4B77f0D2DA8D1963F11db59 3. Nicholas.bit (**nicholas.bit#4746) -** Community Discord Co-founder 0xE754b9be1f5997F530f889cea3Fc7744cdF4D86b Marketing will target key demographics and share our mission attracting NFT membership advocates that resonate. Allocation uses may include: • Landing page builder • Branding images • Video clips • Photos • Google Analytics • Google Tag Manager • Google Search Console • Google Ads campaign • Google Discover ads • YouTube ads • Twitter ads • Merchandise • Events • Giveaways Additionally, we are requesting that moving forward, 15% of aggregate revenue be set aside for marketing allocations to the marketing Gnosis safe for above items and advocate building programs. We are also proposing that merchandise sales allocations be directed to marketing Gnosis safe for restock and distribution. This can be adjusted as the DAO deems necessary. We believe that our strategy will build our community and grow advocate holders who resonate with our mission. Additionally, we feel that our efforts will generate DAO sustainability for the foreseeable future.
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x80bae65e…a703·#14,714,352·0x9437d044…79993e
# Lower Participation Requirements ![preview image](https://static.tally.xyz/4c8203cc-b29c-415e-9cef-ae795085197b_400x400.jpg) Goal:: Currently with the number of folks that have claimed and delegated their Vote the current DAO settings are unrealistic for participation. This proposal will reduce the proposal threshold to 1 (meaning you need only one vote token to make a proposal) and reduce the Vote Quorum to 10%. We can revisit this in the future, if the quorum is too low, and not enough people pay attention, it will be possible to rug the DAO. However at the moment the greater probably is not having enough participation. Image Preview by Steve Johnson @Unsplash https://unsplash.com/photos/wpw8sHoBtSY
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x80bae65e…a703·#14,522,524·0x4f904093…592dc5
# Startup # Pride Punk DAO Setup This proposal will setup the initial conditions for the Pride Punk DAO. **Proposal Threshold: **1 Vote Token **Proposal Delay: **1 block<br> **Proposal Duration: **1 week<br> **Proposal Quorum: **25% A basic explainer of how the DAO Works: <br> [https://pridepunks.notion.site/DAO-Explainer-bf265cb8b9564c98bbe0f01ea80a44c5](<https://pridepunks.notion.site/DAO-Explainer-bf265cb8b9564c98bbe0f01ea80a44c5>)<br> <br>
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x80bae65e…a703·#14,490,827·0xb8f5612a…909a4e
# Test #2 of controlling the Gnosis Safe Treasury This is a second attempt to control the Gnosis Safe Treasury, I might have made a typo previously.<br> <br> Again, sending 0.01 Eth back to my own address.
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x80bae65e…a703·#14,490,468·0x64e9dc08…70d560
# Test Gnosis Safe Ownership This proposal is to test that we have successfully added the PridePunk DAO as a module on the Gnosis Safe Treasury.<br> <br> To make the test we are transferring .01 ETH out of the multisig back to the Founder (the founder previously sent the ETH to the multisig as a test) Treasury Address: 0xeF352CbB151833842A2D8Baa22ED9E686e5B08AB
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0x80bae65e…a703·#14,471,379·0x399c34b5…1df3a9
# GM! This is the first proposal of the Pride Punk DAO. <br> <br> This proposal is meant to test the operation of the DAO. <br> <br> It sets the proposal threshold at 3. <br> It sets the quorum to 51% (normally way too high, but need a bit of protection early on)<br> <br> <br>
0xc832be14…64a4sent to0xe8d848de…3f31·#14,445,886·0x2a2dff1b…f3c6bf
Hey Dennison, was wondering if my address was eligible for the WL mint. P.S. The controller contract is much neater now, glad you noticed counter flaw. P.P.S. You can respond here or on Twitter, I ll see it.
0xe8d848de…3f31sent to0xdbd38f7e…0e0c·#13,442,983·0x6702121e…f85e5f
So proud of this community! I can't believe we've gone from a tweet on twitter to a full on governance, so many fans, so many contributors, a real decentralized community-run and led project. Congrats to us all!
0xe8d848de…3f31·#13,155,816·0x1debf72c…a23ce4
support=bravo&quorum=bravoGovernor: proposal not successfu`DGovernorTimelockCompound: identi`Dcal proposal action already queu`dGovernor: proposal not successfu`DGovernorBravo: proposer above th`DGovernor: onlyGovernanceSafeCast: value doesn't fit in 6`DGovernor: vote not currently act`DU[PPPPPPPPPV[`@Qcx-oGovernorTimelockCompound: propos`Dal not yet queuedECDSA: invalid signatureECDSA: invalid signature lengthECDSA: invalid signature 's' val`DECDSA: invalid signature 'v' val`DGovernorCompatibilityBravo: vote`DGovernorCompatibilityBravo: inva`DGovernor: unknown proposal idGovernorCompatibilityBravo: prop`Doser votes below proposal thresh`dSafeCast: value doesn't fit in 9`DGovernor: proposal not activeGovernor: invalid proposal lengt`DGovernor: invalid proposal lengt`DGovernor: empty proposalGovernor: proposal already exist`D
0xe8d848de…3f31·#13,150,219·0xb02cf549…5558ed
support=bravo&quorum=for,abstaina!LWa!Ka5+V[[a!Xa"4Wa"3a5+V[[a"@ECDSA: invalid signatureGovernorCompatibilityBravo: prop`oser votes below proposal thresh` ECDSA: invalid signature lengthGovernor: invalid proposal lengt`ECDSA: invalid signature 's' val`GovernorVotingSimple: vote alrea`Governor: vote not currently act`Governor: empty proposalECDSA: invalid signature 'v' val`SafeCast: value doesn't fit in 6`Governor: proposal not successfu`Governor: unknown proposal idGovernorVotingSimple: invalid va`lue for enum VoteTypeGovernor: proposal already exist`a9`Wa9_a4[V[[PV[a9lGovernor: call reverted without message
1-50 of 73