0x8e72d414…9afdsent to0x5e503162…fe37·#25,800,709·0x9a51ebc3…fddf86
# Reembolso integral e saida da DAO / Full refund and exit from the DAO
---
## PT
### Em uma frase
**A DAO recebe 114 NounsBR — 18.4% de todo o supply — e paga por eles exatamente o
que ja recebeu de mim nos leiloes: 2.14822 ETH.** Depois disso eu saio da DAO em
definitivo.
| A DAO paga | A DAO recebe |
|---|---|
| **2.148220 ETH** — o mesmo ETH que entrou pelos meus lances | **114 NounsBR** — 18.4% do supply |
### Tres motivos para votar a favor
**1. E justo.** Peco apenas o principal. Sem lucro, sem premio, sem reembolso do gas
que paguei do meu bolso. Nem um wei acima do que o tesouro efetivamente recebeu.
**2. E verificavel — voce nao precisa acreditar em mim.** Cada numero desta proposta
esta on-chain e pode ser conferido por qualquer pessoa: os 114 leiloes, o valor pago
em cada um, a soma final. O contrato que executa a troca ja esta publicado e
verificado no Etherscan. A secao **Como verificar esta proposta em 4 passos** mostra
como checar tudo em poucos minutos.
**3. E seguro para a DAO — a troca e atomica.** Uma unica transacao faz as duas
metades ao mesmo tempo: os NFTs entram no tesouro e o pagamento sai. Nao existe
cenario em que o tesouro pague e nao receba os 114 NFTs, porque o proprio contrato
se recusa a rodar de qualquer outra forma. Se algo falhar, nada acontece e o tesouro
nao gasta nada. O risco desta operacao e inteiramente meu.
### O valor exato
Este pedido cobre exclusivamente **o que o tesouro efetivamente recebeu**. O gas pago aos validadores da Ethereum e os lances perdidos — que a propria casa de leiloes ja devolveu automaticamente — nao estao incluidos:
| | ETH |
|---|---|
| Lances vencedores (recebidos pelo tesouro) | **2.148220** |
| Gas pago a validadores — **NAO solicitado** | 0.096917 |
| Lances perdidos, devolvidos automaticamente — **NAO solicitado** | 1.166120 |
| **Total solicitado** | **2.148220** |
O tesouro tem hoje 4.129846 ETH. Apos o reembolso restam **1.981626 ETH**, e a DAO fica com 114 NounsBR a mais.
### Preco pago por cada NFT
114 leiloes vencidos entre 03/08/2026 20:05 UTC e 05/08/2026 14:20 UTC. Preco medio 0.018844 ETH.
| Preco unitario | Quantidade | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0100 ETH | 101 | 1.0100 ETH |
| 0.0102 ETH | 1 | 0.0102 ETH |
| 0.0200 ETH | 1 | 0.0200 ETH |
| 0.0245 ETH | 1 | 0.0245 ETH |
| 0.1020 ETH | 5 | 0.5100 ETH |
| 0.1112 ETH | 3 | 0.3335 ETH |
| 0.1200 ETH | 2 | 0.2400 ETH |
| **TOTAL** | **114** | **2.148220 ETH** |
101 dos 114 foram arrematados pelo preco de reserva (0.0100 ETH), sem concorrencia.
### Verificacao on-chain
Enderecos:
- Comprador: https://etherscan.io/address/0x8e72d414E01691C2263e2c70c3195Da871079AFD
- Casa de leiloes: https://etherscan.io/address/0x20917fd44eb335692dd66b42db30ea1cfe0b2027
- Tesouro (Timelock): https://etherscan.io/address/0x6159b003ff5a37de6ca0859f4617e9a0064226d1
- Token NounsBR: https://etherscan.io/token/0x36b2aa1795d8cdef4b784fe34045fadc45d61e8c
- Contrato de entrega (verificado): https://etherscan.io/address/0xAbAFac3FA262943f76Cb25D5BAb9c92de502499f#code
Todos os 114 eventos `AuctionSettled` com `winner = 0x8e72d414...` estao nos logs da casa de leiloes:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x20917fd44eb335692dd66b42db30ea1cfe0b2027#events
Os 13 leiloes acima do preco de reserva, transacao por transacao:
| NounBR | Preco | Transacao |
|---|---|---|
| #529 | 0.0200 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa993abdc1a0cc2ded6f08f0d965cb9475410c264264fdd5d00c7af59d3dcda44 |
| #531 | 0.0245 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x73165d0f0e444e502c9b719e77790413f9cebed53f499e0a0d250808bc550b1d |
| #576 | 0.1200 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x00e6dfb4d34dd055f5379a64022c39a503175e0ec686e99c87b9ff647dc857f8 |
| #577 | 0.1200 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x71fb15159cf2cea142f85e997e1ded71e718daf8479655edbed8bc3695d6c553 |
| #578 | 0.0102 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x8cb00f5f462a41e17588a410427577f8279c8b5e05933a8238a4af7ceb15bf66 |
| #579 | 0.1020 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9d34f24502cf55c0f63066dd1f541069e9469dc72fcec7efb055bd5856383d66 |
| #581 | 0.1020 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x7bb3e3a224e2103bf322880f43544ae808971e8133051cc4207b44d1968cd0b9 |
| #582 | 0.1020 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0xd88312db7952d1e7cf62192909fc8857204d5bdcf7e0f3edcf27419d9053b07d |
| #585 | 0.1020 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf84603a3755bd33f53b32b4e423e3e64d5691661eece36db4f6895a0bdb2df24 |
| #587 | 0.1020 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc297993481c7e33c8f4b5320a0601d1386eda16d08bba405109bbf82e7a51c97 |
| #588 | 0.1112 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4801cedcea2d93e25eafa9a08bf871ca24b09bcf97559dd1cfa1149de0bfc6a1 |
| #589 | 0.1112 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc9630ea80a3488874178140d6a84b3942d0fd6540084699e53b245c13dd55a0d |
| #591 | 0.1112 ETH | https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9211670e1854b56145a905b0319b732922b4f0083c332c2e07505d6411c7099b |
Os outros 101 foram todos a 0.0100 ETH (preco de reserva).
Primeiro leilao vencido (#529): https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa993abdc1a0cc2ded6f08f0d965cb9475410c264264fdd5d00c7af59d3dcda44
Ultimo leilao vencido (#665): https://etherscan.io/tx/0x98c763b19c87816073767af856f93762e44f5a5adf55c3b68e506d80b2b358fe
Conferencia aritmetica, verificavel por qualquer pessoa:
```
depositado na carteira 2.251543 ETH
lances vencedores (tesouro) 2.148220 ETH <-- valor pedido aqui
gas pago a validadores 0.096917 ETH <-- nao pedido
saldo restante 0.006406 ETH
2.251543 - 2.148220 - 0.096917 = 0.006406 OK
```
(0.006406 e o saldo logo apos o ultimo leilao. O saldo atual e um pouco menor
porque paguei o gas do deploy do contrato de entrega e da aprovacao ERC-721 —
tambem por minha conta, tambem nao solicitado aqui.)
### Os 114 NounsBR que serao devolvidos
529, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 571, 572, 573, 574, 576, 577, 578, 579, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 591, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 621, 622, 623, 624, 626, 628, 629, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 656, 657, 658, 659, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665
### Compromisso e garantias
1. **Voto apenas nesta proposta.** Vou votar A FAVOR aqui, porque sem isso o quorum de 80 votos nao e alcancado. Nao votarei em nenhuma outra proposta. Os votos permanecem neste endereco somente ate a execucao e saem dele junto com os NFTs, na mesma transacao.
2. **A troca e atomica por construcao — garantida pelo contrato, nao pela minha palavra.** Esta proposta tem **uma unica acao**. O Timelock envia 2.14822 ETH ao contrato de entrega; o contrato transfere os 114 NounsBR de mim para o tesouro e repassa os 2.14822 ETH para mim, tudo dentro da mesma chamada. O contrato recusa qualquer outra combinacao: `if (msg.value != PRICE) revert WrongAmount();`. Nao existe caminho em que o tesouro pague sem receber os NFTs, nem em que os NFTs saiam sem o pagamento. Se eu revogar a aprovacao ERC-721, a chamada inteira reverte e o tesouro nao gasta nada.
3. **Preparacao ja feita, on-chain, antes desta proposta existir.**
**a) Contrato de entrega, publicado e verificado:**
https://etherscan.io/address/0xAbAFac3FA262943f76Cb25D5BAb9c92de502499f#code
Transacao de deploy: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe922872f786c82389c594fea25ea8ac1c7ac267900bcb49949af3302bb8e0fa1
Compilado com **solc v0.8.17 + optimizer 10000 runs** — exatamente as mesmas
configuracoes de todos os contratos da NounsBR. 1203 bytes de bytecode. O codigo
inteiro cabe em uma tela:
```solidity
contract NounsBRExitEscrowV2 {
IERC721 public constant TOKEN = IERC721(0x36b2AA1795d8cdEf4B784Fe34045fAdC45d61e8c);
address public constant SELLER = 0x8e72d414E01691C2263e2c70c3195Da871079AFD;
address public constant TREASURY = 0x6159B003fF5a37de6Ca0859f4617e9A0064226d1;
uint256 public constant PRICE = 2148220000000000000; // 2.14822 ETH
function deliver(uint256[] calldata ids) external payable {
if (msg.sender != TREASURY) revert OnlyTreasury();
if (msg.value != PRICE) revert WrongAmount();
for (uint256 i; i < ids.length; ++i)
TOKEN.transferFrom(SELLER, TREASURY, ids[i]);
(bool ok, ) = SELLER.call{value: PRICE}("");
if (!ok) revert PaymentFailed();
}
}
```
Sem dono, sem funcao de upgrade, sem storage, sem constructor, sem fallback —
o contrato nao consegue nem receber ETH fora desta chamada. Os quatro valores
que importam (token, vendedor, tesouro e preco) sao constantes no bytecode:
nao ha nada para configurar e nada que eu possa alterar depois.
**b) Aprovacao ERC-721 ja concedida:**
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x06516b4985a677f5adc4b531b72dea923f69b19e899174435035bada6e7acef9
`setApprovalForAll(0x4CB42feb..., true)` no token NounsBR. Confirme voce mesmo
com `isApprovedForAll(0x8e72d414..., 0x4CB42feb...)` → `true`.
Nada aqui depende de confianca: o codigo esta publicado, a aprovacao esta dada,
e a entrega e mecanica.
4. **Todo o risco e meu, nenhum e da DAO.** A DAO nao adianta nada, nao assina nada, nao depende de nenhuma promessa minha e nao precisa confiar em mim. Ou recebe os 114 NFTs e paga no mesmo bloco, ou nao acontece absolutamente nada. Se esta proposta nao for aprovada, o tesouro simplesmente mantem os seus 4.129846 ETH e quem perde o gas sou eu.
5. **Saida definitiva.** Nao voltarei a licitar nos leiloes da NounsBR com este nem com outro endereco. Apos a execucao a aprovacao ERC-721 deixa de ter qualquer utilidade, pois o endereco fica sem tokens.
### Por que isto e um bom negocio para a NounsBR
**1. A DAO adquire 18.4% do proprio supply pagando apenas o que ja havia recebido.**
Nao e um gasto novo. E o mesmo ETH que entrou pelos leiloes voltando, e em troca o tesouro fica com 114 NounsBR que hoje nao tem. Nenhum outro caminho entrega 114 NounsBR ao tesouro por 2.148220 ETH.
**2. A distribuicao de votos fica bem mais equilibrada.**
Hoje 114 votos estao concentrados em um unico endereco. Depois desta troca esses 114 ficam com o tesouro, e o maior detentor individual fora do grupo ativo passa a ter 43 votos.
**3. Quem constroi a DAO passa a ter maioria confortavel e definitiva.**
Os enderecos que votaram na proposta #23 somam 91 votos. Somados aos dois grandes delegados (67 e 58), esse grupo controla **216 votos** — quase o triplo do quorum de 80, e mais de 42% de todo o supply em circulacao apos a troca. Na pratica: qualquer proposta que esse grupo apoiar passa com folga, e nenhum ator isolado consegue barra-la, porque nenhum outro endereco chega perto desse peso. A DAO deixa de depender de negociacao com terceiros para aprovar o que quiser.
**4. O quorum nao muda e continua perfeitamente alcancavel.**
Os tokens sao transferidos ao tesouro, nao queimados — o supply segue em 620 e o quorum segue em 80, o mesmo numero das propostas #18 a #22, que reuniram 98, 92, 79 e 92 votos a favor. Nada na dinamica de votacao da DAO fica mais dificil.
**5. Tudo acontece em uma unica transacao, hoje.**
Uma proposta, uma acao, um bloco. Eu entrei pelos leiloes e saio devolvendo tudo.
### Como verificar esta proposta em 4 passos
Nada aqui precisa ser aceito na minha palavra. Qualquer pessoa pode conferir tudo
antes de votar:
**1. A acao pede exatamente 2.14822 ETH.** Leia `value` na acao abaixo:
`2148220000000000000` wei. E o mesmo numero que o contrato exige na constante
`PRICE` — se a proposta pedisse qualquer outro valor, a execucao reverteria.
**2. A lista tem exatamente 114 ids — da para conferir pelo tamanho.** O calldata
da acao tem **3712 bytes**. Um array `uint256[]` em ABI ocupa 32 bytes de offset +
32 bytes de tamanho + 32 bytes por elemento:
```
32 + 32 + (114 x 32) = 32 + 32 + 3648 = 3712 bytes
```
Se houvesse 113 ou 115 ids, o calldata teria 3680 ou 3744 bytes. Decodifique o
calldata e compare com a lista publicada acima — os numeros batem um a um.
**3. A lista nao pode mudar depois.** `proposals[id].calldatas` e gravado uma unica
vez dentro de `propose()` e nunca mais alterado. Na execucao, o Timelock recalcula
`keccak256(target, value, signature, data, eta)` e so aceita se bater com o que foi
enfileirado. Nem eu nem ninguem pode trocar a lista entre a votacao e a execucao.
**4. O contrato faz o que diz.** O codigo esta verificado no Etherscan (link acima),
compilado com as mesmas configuracoes da NounsBR, e cabe em uma tela. Confira
tambem, com qualquer leitor de contrato:
- `NounsBRExitEscrowV2.PRICE()` → `2148220000000000000`
- `NounsBRExitEscrowV2.TREASURY()` → o Timelock da DAO
- `NounsBRToken.isApprovedForAll(0x8e72d414..., 0xAbAFac3F...)` → `true`
### Acao executada (uma unica acao)
```
target 0xAbAFac3FA262943f76Cb25D5BAb9c92de502499f (NounsBRExitEscrowV2)
value 2148220000000000000 (2.14822 ETH)
signature deliver(uint256[])
calldata os 114 ids listados acima
```
Uma acao, uma transacao, um bloco. O Timelock envia 2.14822 ETH ao contrato, o
contrato move os 114 NounsBR para o tesouro e repassa o ETH para mim. Uma falha
em qualquer etapa reverte tudo.
---
## EN
### In one sentence
**The DAO receives 114 NounsBR — 18.4% of the entire supply — and pays for them
exactly what it already received from me in the auctions: 2.14822 ETH.** After that
I leave the DAO permanently.
| The DAO pays | The DAO receives |
|---|---|
| **2.148220 ETH** — the same ETH my bids brought in | **114 NounsBR** — 18.4% of supply |
### Three reasons to vote for
**1. It is fair.** I ask for the principal and nothing else. No profit, no premium,
no reimbursement for the gas I paid out of my own pocket. Not one wei above what the
treasury actually received.
**2. It is verifiable — you do not have to trust me.** Every number in this proposal
is on-chain and can be checked by anyone: the 114 auctions, the price paid in each,
the final sum. The contract that performs the swap is already deployed and verified
on Etherscan. The section **How to verify this proposal in 4 steps** shows how to
check all of it in a few minutes.
**3. It is safe for the DAO — the swap is atomic.** A single transaction performs
both halves at once: the NFTs enter the treasury and the payment leaves it. There is
no scenario where the treasury pays and does not receive the 114 NFTs, because the
contract itself refuses to run any other way. If anything fails, nothing happens and
the treasury spends nothing. The risk in this operation is entirely mine.
### The exact figure
This request covers strictly **what the treasury actually received**. Gas paid to Ethereum validators, and losing bids — which the auction house already refunded automatically — are not included:
| | ETH |
|---|---|
| Winning bids (received by treasury) | **2.148220** |
| Gas paid to validators — **NOT requested** | 0.096917 |
| Losing bids, auto-refunded — **NOT requested** | 1.166120 |
| **Total requested** | **2.148220** |
The treasury currently holds 4.129846 ETH. After the refund it keeps **1.981626 ETH** — plus 114 NounsBR it did not have before.
### Price paid per NFT
114 auctions won between 2026-08-03 20:05 UTC and 2026-08-05 14:20 UTC. Average 0.018844 ETH.
| Unit price | Count | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0100 ETH | 101 | 1.0100 ETH |
| 0.0102 ETH | 1 | 0.0102 ETH |
| 0.0200 ETH | 1 | 0.0200 ETH |
| 0.0245 ETH | 1 | 0.0245 ETH |
| 0.1020 ETH | 5 | 0.5100 ETH |
| 0.1112 ETH | 3 | 0.3335 ETH |
| 0.1200 ETH | 2 | 0.2400 ETH |
| **TOTAL** | **114** | **2.148220 ETH** |
101 of the 114 were won at the reserve price (0.0100 ETH), uncontested.
### On-chain verification
All 114 `AuctionSettled` events with `winner = 0x8e72d414...` are in the auction house logs:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x20917fd44eb335692dd66b42db30ea1cfe0b2027#events
The 13 above-reserve wins are listed with their transaction hashes in the PT section above. Arithmetic check anyone can reproduce:
```
deposited into wallet 2.251543 ETH
winning bids (treasury) 2.148220 ETH <-- amount requested here
gas paid to validators 0.096917 ETH <-- not requested
remaining balance 0.006406 ETH
2.251543 - 2.148220 - 0.096917 = 0.006406 OK
```
(0.006406 is the balance right after the last auction. The current balance is
slightly lower because I paid the gas for deploying the delivery contract and
for the ERC-721 approval — also out of my pocket, also not requested here.)
### Commitments and guarantees
1. **I vote on this proposal only.** I will vote FOR here, because without it the 80-vote quorum is not reached. I will not vote on any other proposal. The votes stay on this address only until execution, and they leave it together with the NFTs, in the same transaction.
2. **The swap is atomic by construction — enforced by the contract, not by my word.** This proposal has **a single action**. The Timelock sends 2.14822 ETH to the delivery contract; the contract moves the 114 NounsBR from me to the treasury and forwards the 2.14822 ETH to me, all inside the same call. The contract refuses every other combination: `if (msg.value != PRICE) revert WrongAmount();`. There is no path in which the treasury pays without receiving the NFTs, and none in which the NFTs leave without payment. If I revoke the ERC-721 approval, the whole call reverts and the treasury spends nothing.
3. **Preparation already done, on-chain, before this proposal existed.**
**a) Delivery contract, deployed and verified:**
https://etherscan.io/address/0xAbAFac3FA262943f76Cb25D5BAb9c92de502499f#code
Deploy transaction: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe922872f786c82389c594fea25ea8ac1c7ac267900bcb49949af3302bb8e0fa1
Compiled with **solc v0.8.17 + optimizer 10000 runs** — the exact settings used
by every NounsBR contract. 1203 bytes of bytecode. The whole thing fits on one screen:
```solidity
contract NounsBRExitEscrowV2 {
IERC721 public constant TOKEN = IERC721(0x36b2AA1795d8cdEf4B784Fe34045fAdC45d61e8c);
address public constant SELLER = 0x8e72d414E01691C2263e2c70c3195Da871079AFD;
address public constant TREASURY = 0x6159B003fF5a37de6Ca0859f4617e9A0064226d1;
uint256 public constant PRICE = 2148220000000000000; // 2.14822 ETH
function deliver(uint256[] calldata ids) external payable {
if (msg.sender != TREASURY) revert OnlyTreasury();
if (msg.value != PRICE) revert WrongAmount();
for (uint256 i; i < ids.length; ++i)
TOKEN.transferFrom(SELLER, TREASURY, ids[i]);
(bool ok, ) = SELLER.call{value: PRICE}("");
if (!ok) revert PaymentFailed();
}
}
```
No owner, no upgrade path, no storage, no constructor, no fallback — the
contract cannot even receive ETH outside this one call. The four values that
matter (token, seller, treasury, price) are bytecode constants: there is
nothing to configure and nothing I can change later.
**b) ERC-721 approval already granted:**
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x06516b4985a677f5adc4b531b72dea923f69b19e899174435035bada6e7acef9
`setApprovalForAll(0x4CB42feb..., true)` on the NounsBR token. Check it yourself:
`isApprovedForAll(0x8e72d414..., 0x4CB42feb...)` → `true`.
Nothing here rests on trust: the code is published, the approval is granted,
and delivery is mechanical.
4. **All the risk is mine, none is the DAO's.** The DAO advances nothing, signs nothing, depends on no promise of mine and does not need to trust me. Either it receives the 114 NFTs and pays in the same block, or nothing whatsoever happens. If this proposal is not approved, the treasury simply keeps its 4.129846 ETH and I am the one out of pocket for the gas.
5. **Permanent exit.** I will not bid in NounsBR auctions again, from this address or any other. After execution the ERC-721 approval is useless anyway, since the address holds no tokens.
### Why this is a good deal for NounsBR
**1. The DAO acquires 18.4% of its own supply for exactly what it already received.**
This is not new spending. It is the same ETH that came in through the auctions going back out, and in return the treasury ends up holding 114 NounsBR it does not have today. No other route puts 114 NounsBR in the treasury for 2.148220 ETH.
**2. Vote distribution becomes far more balanced.**
Today 114 votes sit in a single address. After this swap those 114 belong to the treasury, and the largest individual holder outside the active group holds 43 votes.
**3. The people who actually build the DAO gain a comfortable, durable majority.**
The addresses that voted on proposal #23 hold 91 votes between them. Together with the two large delegates (67 and 58), that group controls **216 votes** — nearly three times the 80-vote quorum, and over 42% of all supply circulating after the swap. In practice: any proposal that group supports passes comfortably, and no single actor can block it, because no other address comes close to that weight. The DAO stops having to negotiate with an outsider to approve what it wants.
**4. Quorum does not change and stays perfectly reachable.**
The tokens are transferred to the treasury, not burned — supply stays at 620 and quorum stays at 80, the same figure as proposals #18 to #22, which gathered 98, 92, 79 and 92 votes in favour. Nothing about the DAO's voting dynamics gets harder.
**5. Everything happens in a single transaction, today.**
One proposal, one action, one block. I came in through the auctions and I am leaving by handing everything back.
### How to verify this proposal in 4 steps
Nothing here has to be taken on my word. Anyone can check all of it before voting:
**1. The action requests exactly 2.14822 ETH.** Read `value` in the action below:
`2148220000000000000` wei. That is the same number the contract enforces in its
`PRICE` constant — a proposal asking for any other amount would revert on execution.
**2. The list holds exactly 114 ids — you can tell from its size.** The action's
calldata is **3712 bytes**. An ABI-encoded `uint256[]` takes 32 bytes of offset +
32 bytes of length + 32 bytes per element:
```
32 + 32 + (114 x 32) = 32 + 32 + 3648 = 3712 bytes
```
With 113 or 115 ids the calldata would be 3680 or 3744 bytes. Decode the calldata
and compare it with the list published above — the numbers match one for one.
**3. The list cannot change afterwards.** `proposals[id].calldatas` is written once
inside `propose()` and never modified. At execution the Timelock recomputes
`keccak256(target, value, signature, data, eta)` and only accepts a match with what
was queued. Neither I nor anyone else can swap the list between the vote and execution.
**4. The contract does what it says.** The code is verified on Etherscan (link above),
compiled with the same settings as the NounsBR contracts, and fits on one screen.
Check these too, with any contract reader:
- `NounsBRExitEscrowV2.PRICE()` → `2148220000000000000`
- `NounsBRExitEscrowV2.TREASURY()` → the DAO Timelock
- `NounsBRToken.isApprovedForAll(0x8e72d414..., 0xAbAFac3F...)` → `true`
### Executed action (a single action)
```
target 0xAbAFac3FA262943f76Cb25D5BAb9c92de502499f (NounsBRExitEscrowV2)
value 2148220000000000000 (2.14822 ETH)
signature deliver(uint256[])
calldata the 114 ids listed above
```
One action, one transaction, one block. The Timelock sends 2.14822 ETH to the
contract, the contract moves the 114 NounsBR to the treasury and forwards the ETH
to me. A failure at any step reverts everything.